Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Accelerating Colorectal Cancer Screening and Follow-up through Implementation Science (ACCSIS) in Appalachia: protocol for a group randomized, delayed intervention trial

  • Electra D. Paskett
  • , Aaron J. Kruse-Diehr
  • , Jill M. Oliveri
  • , Robin C. Vanderpool
  • , Darrell M. Gray
  • , Michael L. Pennell
  • , Bin Huang
  • , Gregory S. Young
  • , Darla Fickle
  • , Mark Cromo
  • , Mira L. Katz
  • , Paul L. Reiter
  • , Melinda Rogers
  • , David A. Gross
  • , Vickie Fairchild
  • , Wendy Xu
  • , Angela Carman
  • , Jean M. Walunis
  • , Ann Scheck Mcalearney
  • , Timothy R. Huerta
  • Saurabh Rahurkar, Erika Biederman, Mark Dignan

Producción científica: Articlerevisión exhaustiva

1 Cita (Scopus)

Resumen

Appalachian regions of Kentucky and Ohio are hotspots for colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality in the USA. Screening reduces CRC incidence and mortality; however, screening uptake is needed, especially in these underserved geographic areas. Implementation science offers strategies to address this challenge. The aim of the current study was to conduct multi-site, transdisciplinary research to evaluate and improve CRC screening processes using implementation science strategies. The study consists of two phases (Planning and Implementation). In the Planning Phase, a multilevel assessment of 12 health centers (HC) (one HC from each of the 12 Appalachian counties) was conducted by interviewing key informants, creating community profiles, identifying HC and community champions, and performing HC data inventories. Two designated pilot HCs chose CRC evidence-based interventions to adapt and implement at each level (i.e., patient, provider, HC, and community) with evaluation relative to two matched control HCs. During the Implementation Phase, study staff will repeat the rollout process in HC and community settings in a randomized, staggered fashion in the remaining eight counties/HCs. Evaluation will include analyses of electronic health record data and provider and county surveys. Rural HCs have been reluctant to participate in research because of concerns about capacity; however, this project should demonstrate that research does not need to be burdensome and can adapt to local needs and HC abilities. If effective, this approach could be disseminated to HC and community partners throughout Appalachia to encourage the uptake of effective interventions to reduce the burden of CRC.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)748-756
Número de páginas9
PublicaciónTranslational Behavioral Medicine
Volumen13
N.º10
DOI
EstadoPublished - oct 1 2023

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Society of Behavioral Medicine. All rights reserved.

Financiación

This study is funded by the National Cancer Institute (4UH3CA233282-02) and supported in part by NCI Cancer Center Support Grants (P30CA177558) and (P30CA016058). Dr. Biederman is supported by NCI T32CA229114.

FinanciadoresNúmero del financiador
National Childhood Cancer Registry – National Cancer Institute4UH3CA233282-02, P30CA177558, T32CA229114, P30CA016058
National Childhood Cancer Registry – National Cancer Institute

    ODS de las Naciones Unidas

    Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible

    1. Good health and well being
      Good health and well being

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Applied Psychology
    • Behavioral Neuroscience

    Huella

    Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Accelerating Colorectal Cancer Screening and Follow-up through Implementation Science (ACCSIS) in Appalachia: protocol for a group randomized, delayed intervention trial'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

    Citar esto