Resumen
Nontraumatic aortic disease can be caused by a wide variety of disorders including congenital, inflammatory, infectious, metabolic, neoplastic, and degenerative processes. Imaging examinations such as radiography, ultrasound, echocardiography, catheter-based angiography, CT, MRI, and nuclear medicine examinations are essential for diagnosis, treatment planning, and assessment of therapeutic response. Depending upon the clinical scenario, each of these modalities has strengths and weaknesses. Whenever possible, the selection of a diagnostic imaging examination should be based upon the best available evidence. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. The purpose of this document is to assist physicians select the most appropriate diagnostic imaging examination for nontraumatic aortic diseases.
| Idioma original | English |
|---|---|
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | S106-S118 |
| Publicación | Journal of the American College of Radiology |
| Volumen | 18 |
| N.º | 5 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Published - may 2021 |
Nota bibliográfica
Publisher Copyright:© 2021 American College of Radiology
Financiación
Dr Ferencik reports receiving grants from NIH, AHA, and personal fees from Consulting, Biograph, Inc. outside the submitted work. Dr Gunn reports personal fees from Boston Scientific, personal fees from Terumo, grants from Penumbra, personal fees from Varian, outside the submitted work; Dr Kalva reports personal fees from Springer, Elsevier, Boston Scientific, Medtronic Inc, Penumbra Inc, Dova Pharmaceuticals, US Vascular, Koo Foundation, GE Healthcare, Althea Health. Grants from Angiodynamics, BD, NIH, outside the submitted work. The other authors state that they have no conflict of interest related to the material discussed in this article. All authors are non-partner/non-partnership track employees.
| Financiadores |
|---|
| National Institutes of Health (NIH) |
| American the American Heart Association |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Nontraumatic Aortic Disease'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver