Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Alternative mating tactics in the Great Plains toad

  • James J. Krupa

Producción científica: Articlerevisión exhaustiva

34 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Male Great Plains toads, Bufo cognatus, exhibit two mating tactics. At any time, most males give advertisement calls to attract females, while other males, 'satellites', remain silent and station themselves near callers in an attempt to intercept females. Females are usually capable of moving through choruses undetected by males. Those females detected by males can avoid being clasped by quickly darting away; but if clasped, can detach the male by inflating. Females initiated amplexus with callers; subsequently calling males mated with 92% of the females and satellites mated with the remaining 8%. Toads employing the satellite tactic associated with males that had longer calls and that were larger, although call duration was the stronger predictor. The percentage of males exhibiting satellite behaviour during a sampling period varied from 0 to 57%. Several hypotheses explaining satellite frequency were explored, including variation in male density, male quality, and operational sex ratio. Of the variables considered, only two aspects of male density (namely, the number of unmated males per m of shoreline and number of calling males per m shoreline) affected satellite frequency. High male density may cause at least some calling males to lose vocal conspicuousness, thereby favouring satellite behaviour. However, male density accounted for only 17% of the observed variation in satellite frequency. This, plus the fact that up to 74% of marked males switched between tactics, suggests that factors such as higher energetic demands of calling may affect satellite frequency.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)1035-1043
Número de páginas9
PublicaciónAnimal Behaviour
Volumen37
N.ºPART 6
DOI
EstadoPublished - jun 1989

Nota bibliográfica

Funding Information:
Thanks are extended to C. Davis, L. MacIvor, M. Paulissen, B. Ploger and S. Secor for their field assistance; to C. Carpenter, T. Lamey, D. Mock, F. Sonleitner, P. Schwagmeyer, G. Shugart and B. Vestal for their helpful suggestions on various drafts of this manuscript; and to the Oklahoma Biological Survey for financial support during the study. Additional funding was provided by the University of Oklahoma Associates’ Fund, the University of Oklahoma Graduate Student Association Grant-in-Aid Program and the Society of Sigma Xi.

Financiación

Thanks are extended to C. Davis, L. MacIvor, M. Paulissen, B. Ploger and S. Secor for their field assistance; to C. Carpenter, T. Lamey, D. Mock, F. Sonleitner, P. Schwagmeyer, G. Shugart and B. Vestal for their helpful suggestions on various drafts of this manuscript; and to the Oklahoma Biological Survey for financial support during the study. Additional funding was provided by the University of Oklahoma Associates’ Fund, the University of Oklahoma Graduate Student Association Grant-in-Aid Program and the Society of Sigma Xi.

Financiadores
University of Oklahoma Associates
University of Oklahoma Graduate Student Association
Sigma-Aldrich

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
    • Animal Science and Zoology

    Huella

    Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Alternative mating tactics in the Great Plains toad'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

    Citar esto