Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Associations of Healthcare Affordability, Availability, and Accessibility with Quality Treatment Metrics in Patients with Ovarian Cancer

  • Tomi F. Akinyemiju
  • , Lauren E. Wilson
  • , Nicole Diaz
  • , Anjali Gupta
  • , Bin Huang
  • , Maria Pisu
  • , April Deveaux
  • , Margaret Liang
  • , Rebecca A. Previs
  • , Haley A. Moss
  • , Ashwini Joshi
  • , Kevin C. Ward
  • , Maria J. Schymura
  • , Andrew Berchuck
  • , Arnold L. Potosky

Producción científica: Articlerevisión exhaustiva

3 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Background: Differential access to quality care is associated with racial disparities in ovarian cancer survival. Few studies have examined the association of multiple healthcare access (HCA) dimensions with racial disparities in quality treatment metrics, that is, primary debulking surgery performed by a gynecologic oncologist and initiation of guideline-recommended systemic therapy. Methods: We analyzed data for patients with ovarian cancer diagnosed from 2008 to 2015 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare database. We defined HCA dimensions as affordability, availability, and accessibility. Modified Poisson regressions with sandwich error estimation were used to estimate the relative risk (RR) for quality treatment. Results: The study cohort was 7% NH-Black, 6% Hispanic, and 87% NH-White. Overall, 29% of patients received surgery and 68% initiated systemic therapy. After adjusting for clinical variables, NH-Black patients were less likely to receive surgery [RR, 0.83; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70–0.98]; the observed association was attenuated after adjusting for healthcare affordability, accessibility, and availability (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.77–1.08). Dual enrollment in Medicaid and Medicare compared with Medicare only was associated with lower likelihood of receiving surgery (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76–0.97) and systemic therapy (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.92–0.97). Receiving treatment at a facility in the highest quartile of ovarian cancer surgical volume was associated with higher likelihood of surgery (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.04–1.21). Conclusions: Racial differences were observed in ovarian cancer treatment quality and were partly explained by multiple HCA dimensions. Impact: Strategies to mitigate racial disparities in ovarian cancer treatment quality must focus on multiple HCA dimensions. Additional dimensions, acceptability and accommodation, may also be key to addressing disparities.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)1383-1393
Número de páginas11
PublicaciónCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
Volumen31
N.º7
DOI
EstadoPublished - jul 2022

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
©2022 American Association for Cancer Research

Financiación

The authors acknowledge the helpful assistance provided by the SEER-Medicare reviewers, Information Management System coordinator Elaine Yanisko, and all the patients whose valuable data contributed to this study. Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award number R37CA233777 (to T.F. Akinyemiju). L.E. Wilson reports grants from National Cancer Institute during the conduct of the study; and grants from AstraZeneca outside the submitted work. M. Pisu reports grants from NIH during the conduct of the study. R.A. Previs reports other support from Myriad Genetics and Natera outside the submitted work. K.C. Ward reports other support from NCI SEER during the conduct of the study. M.J. Schymura reports grants from NCI/Duke University School of Medicine during the conduct of the study. No disclosures were reported by the other authors.

FinanciadoresNúmero del financiador
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
National Childhood Cancer Registry – National Cancer InstituteR37CA233777
National Childhood Cancer Registry – National Cancer Institute
AstraZeneca

    ODS de las Naciones Unidas

    Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible

    1. Good health and well being
      Good health and well being

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Epidemiology
    • Oncology

    Huella

    Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Associations of Healthcare Affordability, Availability, and Accessibility with Quality Treatment Metrics in Patients with Ovarian Cancer'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

    Citar esto