Resumen
For decades, unfractionated heparin (UFH) has been widely used in catheterization laboratories for anticoagulation for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The direct thrombin inhibitors, bivalirudin, has emerged as an alternative to UFH for PCI procedures, due to its lower bleeding risk. More recently, randomized trials and meta-analyses questioned the efficacy of bivalirudin, and demonstrated that bivalirudin might be associated with a higher incidence of ischemic events and in particular stent thrombosis. In this review, we discuss the pharmacology of bivalirudin along with the clinical evidence comparing bivalirudin versus UFH in patients undergoing PCI for various indications.
| Idioma original | English |
|---|---|
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 227-235 |
| Número de páginas | 9 |
| Publicación | Cardiovascular Therapeutics |
| Volumen | 33 |
| N.º | 4 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Published - ago 1 2015 |
Nota bibliográfica
Publisher Copyright:© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Pharmacology
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Pharmacology (medical)
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Bivalirudin in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, is it the Anticoagulant of Choice?'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver