Briquetting of coal fines and sawdust part I: Binder and briquetting-parameters evaluations

D. Taulbee; D. P. Patil; Rick Q. Honaker; B. K. Parekh

doi:10.1080/19392690802628705

Briquetting of coal fines and sawdust part I: Binder and briquetting-parameters evaluations

D. Taulbee
, D. P. Patil
, Rick Q. Honaker
, B. K. Parekh

Producción científica: Article › revisión exhaustiva

66 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Various technical and economic aspects relating to the briquetting of fine coal with sawdust have been evaluated with the results for two segments of that study presented here: binder and briquetting-parameter evaluations. Approximately 50 potential binder formulations were subjected to a series of screening evaluations to identify three formulations that were the most cost effective for briquetting fine coal with sawdust. Two of the binders, guar gum and wheat starch, were selected as most suitable for the pulverized coal market while the third formulation, lignosulfonate/lime, was targeted for the stoker market. Following binder selection, a number of briquetting parameters including binder and sawdust concentration, sawdust type, briquetting pressure and dwell time, coal and sawdust particle size, clay content, moisture content, and cure temperature and cure time were evaluated. Briquetting pressure and dwell time have the least impact while binder and sawdust concentrations, sawdust type, and curing conditions exerted the greatest influence on briquette quality.

Idioma original	English
Páginas (desde-hasta)	1-22
Número de páginas	22
Publicación	International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization
Volumen	29
N.º	1
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1080/19392690802628705
Estado	Published - ene 2009

Nota bibliográfica

Funding Information:
Funding for this research was provided in part by the U.S. Department of Energy, State Industries of the Future (DE-FC07-02ID14273). The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of TECO Coal, James River Coal, and Cooke & Sons Mining for the fine-coal samples and H&S Lumber and Sandy Gaye Lumber for the sawdust samples. We also wish to acknowledge the provision of binder materials from a number of sources including ADM, Meade-Westvaco, Northway Lignin, Omni Materials, ABC Coke, US Sugar Corporation, Marathon-Ashland, Anheuser-Busch, Hase Petroleum, PQ Corp., Akzo-Nobel, the Heritage Group, and Bob Rooksby. Address correspondence to D. Taulbee. E-mail: [email protected]

Financiación

Funding for this research was provided in part by the U.S. Department of Energy, State Industries of the Future (DE-FC07-02ID14273). The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of TECO Coal, James River Coal, and Cooke & Sons Mining for the fine-coal samples and H&S Lumber and Sandy Gaye Lumber for the sawdust samples. We also wish to acknowledge the provision of binder materials from a number of sources including ADM, Meade-Westvaco, Northway Lignin, Omni Materials, ABC Coke, US Sugar Corporation, Marathon-Ashland, Anheuser-Busch, Hase Petroleum, PQ Corp., Akzo-Nobel, the Heritage Group, and Bob Rooksby. Address correspondence to D. Taulbee. E-mail: [email protected]

Financiadores	Número del financiador
State Industries of the Future	DE-FC07-02ID14273
Michigan State University-U.S. Department of Energy (MSU-DOE) Plant Research Laboratory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Chemical Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Fuel Technology

Acceder al documento

10.1080/19392690802628705

Otros archivos y enlaces

Citar esto

@article{fa882b46a1fd403ea7a0ff2ca2ee2c2d,

title = "Briquetting of coal fines and sawdust part I: Binder and briquetting-parameters evaluations",

abstract = "Various technical and economic aspects relating to the briquetting of fine coal with sawdust have been evaluated with the results for two segments of that study presented here: binder and briquetting-parameter evaluations. Approximately 50 potential binder formulations were subjected to a series of screening evaluations to identify three formulations that were the most cost effective for briquetting fine coal with sawdust. Two of the binders, guar gum and wheat starch, were selected as most suitable for the pulverized coal market while the third formulation, lignosulfonate/lime, was targeted for the stoker market. Following binder selection, a number of briquetting parameters including binder and sawdust concentration, sawdust type, briquetting pressure and dwell time, coal and sawdust particle size, clay content, moisture content, and cure temperature and cure time were evaluated. Briquetting pressure and dwell time have the least impact while binder and sawdust concentrations, sawdust type, and curing conditions exerted the greatest influence on briquette quality.",

keywords = "Binders, Biomass, Briquetting, Fine coal, Fuel, Waste",

author = "D. Taulbee and Patil, \{D. P.\} and Honaker, \{Rick Q.\} and Parekh, \{B. K.\}",

note = "Funding Information: Funding for this research was provided in part by the U.S. Department of Energy, State Industries of the Future (DE-FC07-02ID14273). The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of TECO Coal, James River Coal, and Cooke \& Sons Mining for the fine-coal samples and H\&S Lumber and Sandy Gaye Lumber for the sawdust samples. We also wish to acknowledge the provision of binder materials from a number of sources including ADM, Meade-Westvaco, Northway Lignin, Omni Materials, ABC Coke, US Sugar Corporation, Marathon-Ashland, Anheuser-Busch, Hase Petroleum, PQ Corp., Akzo-Nobel, the Heritage Group, and Bob Rooksby. Address correspondence to D. Taulbee. E-mail: [email protected]",

year = "2009",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1080/19392690802628705",

language = "English",

volume = "29",

pages = "1--22",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Briquetting of coal fines and sawdust part I

T2 - Binder and briquetting-parameters evaluations

AU - Taulbee, D.

AU - Patil, D. P.

AU - Honaker, Rick Q.

AU - Parekh, B. K.

N1 - Funding Information: Funding for this research was provided in part by the U.S. Department of Energy, State Industries of the Future (DE-FC07-02ID14273). The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of TECO Coal, James River Coal, and Cooke & Sons Mining for the fine-coal samples and H&S Lumber and Sandy Gaye Lumber for the sawdust samples. We also wish to acknowledge the provision of binder materials from a number of sources including ADM, Meade-Westvaco, Northway Lignin, Omni Materials, ABC Coke, US Sugar Corporation, Marathon-Ashland, Anheuser-Busch, Hase Petroleum, PQ Corp., Akzo-Nobel, the Heritage Group, and Bob Rooksby. Address correspondence to D. Taulbee. E-mail: [email protected]

PY - 2009/1

Y1 - 2009/1

N2 - Various technical and economic aspects relating to the briquetting of fine coal with sawdust have been evaluated with the results for two segments of that study presented here: binder and briquetting-parameter evaluations. Approximately 50 potential binder formulations were subjected to a series of screening evaluations to identify three formulations that were the most cost effective for briquetting fine coal with sawdust. Two of the binders, guar gum and wheat starch, were selected as most suitable for the pulverized coal market while the third formulation, lignosulfonate/lime, was targeted for the stoker market. Following binder selection, a number of briquetting parameters including binder and sawdust concentration, sawdust type, briquetting pressure and dwell time, coal and sawdust particle size, clay content, moisture content, and cure temperature and cure time were evaluated. Briquetting pressure and dwell time have the least impact while binder and sawdust concentrations, sawdust type, and curing conditions exerted the greatest influence on briquette quality.

AB - Various technical and economic aspects relating to the briquetting of fine coal with sawdust have been evaluated with the results for two segments of that study presented here: binder and briquetting-parameter evaluations. Approximately 50 potential binder formulations were subjected to a series of screening evaluations to identify three formulations that were the most cost effective for briquetting fine coal with sawdust. Two of the binders, guar gum and wheat starch, were selected as most suitable for the pulverized coal market while the third formulation, lignosulfonate/lime, was targeted for the stoker market. Following binder selection, a number of briquetting parameters including binder and sawdust concentration, sawdust type, briquetting pressure and dwell time, coal and sawdust particle size, clay content, moisture content, and cure temperature and cure time were evaluated. Briquetting pressure and dwell time have the least impact while binder and sawdust concentrations, sawdust type, and curing conditions exerted the greatest influence on briquette quality.

KW - Binders

KW - Biomass

KW - Briquetting

KW - Fine coal

KW - Fuel

KW - Waste

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/60749115893

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/60749115893#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1080/19392690802628705

DO - 10.1080/19392690802628705

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:60749115893

SN - 1939-2699

VL - 29

SP - 1

EP - 22

JO - International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization

JF - International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization

IS - 1

ER -

Briquetting of coal fines and sawdust part I: Binder and briquetting-parameters evaluations

Resumen

Nota bibliográfica

Financiación

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Acceder al documento

Otros archivos y enlaces

Huella

Citar esto