Resumen
The purpose of this study was to evaluate two different groups of patients who underwent bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular advancement. One group demonstrated no relapse, whereas a second group had documented relapse. The following questions were asked: 1) What factors contribute to relapse? 2) At what site in the mandible is movement seen? and 3) During what period does movement occur? A retrospective lateral cephalometric serial analysis was performed on 50 patients at multiple time intervals. Criteria for a candidate include 1) mandibular advancement surgery with rigid fixation, with or without genioplasty, 2) no maxillary surgery, and 3) relapse of 25% or more of the advancement. Of the 50 patients analyzed, 13 (26%) showed relapse of 25% or more and served as the relapse group. Twelve patients showed no relapse and served as the comparison group. Multiple-regression analysis for the relapse group showed that magnitude of advancement, increasing gonial arc and changing mandibular plane significantly accounted for 84.9% of the variance observed in relapse (P < .001). Repeated-measures ANOVA showed that the majority of relapse occurred in the first 6 weeks after surgery (68%, P < .05). Results of a paired t test showed that a significant change occurred in all the linear and angular measures except SN-AR-GO (P < .05).
| Idioma original | English |
|---|---|
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 450-454 |
| Número de páginas | 5 |
| Publicación | Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery |
| Volumen | 48 |
| N.º | 5 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Published - may 1990 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Surgery
- Oral Surgery
- Otorhinolaryngology
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Causes, location, and timing of relapse following rigid fixation after mandibular advancement'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver