Resumen
The construction of the American Psychiatric Association's diagnostic manual has been guided primarily by concerns of construct validity rather than of clinical utility, despite claims by its authors that the highest priority has in fact been clinical utility. The purpose of this article was to further articulate the concept and importance of utility when constructing and evaluating a diagnostic construct. It is suggested that a relative emphasis on validity over utility is justifiable but that matters of clinical utility should not be neglected. Discussed in particular is ease of usage, communication, and treatment planning. Suggestions for future research are provided.
| Idioma original | English |
|---|---|
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 302-312 |
| Número de páginas | 11 |
| Publicación | Psychological Assessment |
| Volumen | 21 |
| N.º | 3 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Published - sept 2009 |
ODS de las Naciones Unidas
Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible
-
Good health and well being
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Clinical Utility and DSM-V'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver