Community coalition and key stakeholder perceptions of the community opioid epidemic before an intensive community-level intervention

Mari Lynn Drainoni, Hannah K. Knudsen, Kathy Adams, Shaquita A. Andrews-Higgins, Vanessa Auritt, Sandi Back, Laura K. Barkowski, Evan J. Batty, Melika R. Behrooz, Sydney Bell, Sadie Chen, Mia Cara Christopher, Nicolette Coovert, Erika L. Crable, Anindita Dasgupta, Michael Goetz, Dawn Goddard-Eckrich, Jeanie L. Hartman, Holly Heffer, Pulwasha IftikharLatasha Jones, Samantha Lang, Karsten Lunze, Anna Martin, Tara McCrimmon, Melissa K. Reedy-Johnson, Carter Roeber, Ariel L. Scalise, Cynthia J. Sieck, Daniel M. Walker, Galya Walt, Jennifer D. Wood, Priscilla Zito, Ann Scheck McAlearney

Producción científica: Articlerevisión exhaustiva

23 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Introduction: Opioid overdoses are a major public health emergency in the United States. Despite effective treatments that can save lives, access to and utilization of such treatments are limited. Community context plays an important role in addressing treatment barriers and increasing access. The HEALing Communities Study (HCS) is a multisite community-level cluster-randomized trial that will study implementation and outcomes of a community coalition-based intervention (Communities that HEAL [CTH]) that implements evidence-based practices (EBPs) to reduce opioid overdose deaths in four states. To examine contextual factors critical to understanding implementation, we assessed the perspectives of community members about their communities, current substance use–related services, and other important issues that could impact intervention implementation. Methods: Researchers conducted 382 semi-structured qualitative interviews in the HCS communities. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed; researchers subsequently analyzed data using directed content analysis based on the constructs of the RE-AIM/PRISM implementation science framework to identify key themes within the external community context. Results: Despite the diversity in states and communities, four similar themes related to the external community context emerged across communities: These themes included the importance of understanding: 1) community risk perceptions, 2) levels of stigma, 3) the health services environment and the availability of substance use services, and 4) funding for substance use services. Conclusion: Understanding and addressing the external community context in which the CTH intervention and EBPs are implemented are crucial for successful health services-related and community engaged interventions. While implementing EBPs is a challenging undertaking, doing so will help us to understand if and how a community-based intervention can successfully reduce opioid overdose deaths and influence both community beliefs and the community treatment landscape.

Idioma originalEnglish
Número de artículo108731
PublicaciónJournal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Volumen138
DOI
EstadoPublished - jul 2022

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Inc.

Financiación

This research is supported by the National Institutes of Health through the NIH HEAL Initiative under award numbers UM1DA049406 (Kentucky), UM1DA049412 (Massachusetts), UM1DA049415 (New York), UM1DA049417 (Ohio), and UM1DA049394 (RTI). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or its NIH HEAL Initiative.

FinanciadoresNúmero del financiador
National Institutes of Health (NIH)UM1DA049394, UM1DA049415, UM1DA049406, UM1DA049417
National Institute on Drug AbuseUM1DA049412

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Psychiatric Mental Health
    • Medicine (miscellaneous)
    • Clinical Psychology
    • Psychiatry and Mental health

    Huella

    Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Community coalition and key stakeholder perceptions of the community opioid epidemic before an intensive community-level intervention'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

    Citar esto