Resumen
Three commonly used numerical schemes for condensational growth of aerosols are compared with analytical solutions. The sectional method is interpreted in light of the upwind differencing and the Smolarkiewicz method. Case studies for fast and slow condensation processes are used to demonstrate the performance of various numerical schemes.
| Idioma original | English |
|---|---|
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 271-277 |
| Número de páginas | 7 |
| Publicación | Aerosol Science and Technology |
| Volumen | 9 |
| N.º | 3 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Published - 1988 |
Nota bibliográfica
Funding Information:This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (CBT-8504377 and the Kentucky EPSCoR Program). Those who are interested in using CONFEMM, please contact T. H. Tsang.
Financiación
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (CBT-8504377 and the Kentucky EPSCoR Program). Those who are interested in using CONFEMM, please contact T. H. Tsang.
| Financiadores | Número del financiador |
|---|---|
| Kentucky Statewide EPSCoR | |
| National Science Foundation (NSF) | CBT-8504377 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Environmental Chemistry
- General Materials Science
- Pollution
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Comparison of different numerical schemes for condensational growth of aerosols'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver