Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Comparison of Indirect and Direct Approaches to Identifying an Unfaithful Partner

Producción científica: Articlerevisión exhaustiva

2 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Infidelity has been operationalized inconsistently across studies, and measurement approaches have been employed that are not ideally suited for addressing the stigmatized and subjective nature of infidelity, thereby limiting the conclusions that can be drawn from this body of literature. In 2016, Thompson and O’Sullivan took a step toward addressing these shortcomings by implementing an indirect measurement approach. We extend their findings using a sample of 465 married and divorced individuals via MTurk. Substantially more participants reported having engaged in infidelity via the indirect approach than the direct approach, and results suggest that—in contrast to findings from direct questioning—similar percentages of men and women engage in self-defined infidelity. Implications for research and clinical practice are provided.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)287-298
Número de páginas12
PublicaciónJournal of Sex and Marital Therapy
Volumen49
N.º3
DOI
EstadoPublished - 2023

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Financiación

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Comparison of Indirect and Direct Approaches to Identifying an Unfaithful Partner'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto