Comparison of parent versus child-report of child impulsivity traits and prediction of outcome variables

Tamika C.B. Zapolski, Gregory T. Smith

Producción científica: Articlerevisión exhaustiva

35 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Five personality traits that dispose individuals to rash or ill-advised action (i.e., sensation seeking, negative urgency, positive urgency, lack of planning, and lack of perseverance), can be reliably and validly assessed in children. This paper reports on the first test of parental reports of these traits. In a sample of 94 children (ages 7-13, mean age 10.6), the authors found the following. First, parental reports of the five traits in their children appeared to be reliable. Second, there was moderate convergent validity: parent and child reports of the same traits had a median correlation of r =.30. Third, there was adequate discriminant validity: within-parent reports on different traits had a median correlation of r =.11. Fourth, concurrent prediction of child behavior from parental reports generally was inconsistent with prior findings. Fifth, discrepancies between the two reporters did predict dysfunctional child behavior. There are advantages to securing both child self-report and parental report of personality dispositions to rash action, although there is limited evidence for the concurrent validity of parental reports.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)301-313
Número de páginas13
PublicaciónJournal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
Volumen35
N.º3
DOI
EstadoPublished - sept 2013

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Comparison of parent versus child-report of child impulsivity traits and prediction of outcome variables'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto