Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Comparison of two low-hazard organic solvents as individual and cosolvents for the fabrication of polysulfone membranes

Producción científica: Articlerevisión exhaustiva

27 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Petroleum-derived solvents commonly used in membrane fabrication are often hazardous and toxic, so the investigation of safer alternatives is important. In this study, two low-hazard solvents, methyl 5-(dimethylamino)-2-methyl-5-oxopentanoate (Rhodiasolv® PolarClean) and gamma-valerolactone (GVL), were investigated as sole solvents and as cosolvents to cast polysulfone membranes via nonsolvent induced phase inversion. Normalized viscosity was introduced as an indicator of dope solution homogeneity and was used to compare the required time of mixing to achieve full dissolution of the polymer in the different solvents/solvent mixtures. All dope solutions made with low-hazard solvents were found to be more viscous than those made with traditional solvents, which meant additional mixing time was needed, and that fabricated membranes were morphologically different. With respect to operation, membranes cast from dope solutions containing equal amounts of PolarClean and GVL displayed the most similar flux curves and solute rejection to those made using the traditional solvent tested.

Idioma originalEnglish
Número de artículoe16790
PublicaciónAICHE Journal
Volumen66
N.º1
DOI
EstadoPublished - ene 1 2020

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Institute of Chemical Engineers

Financiación

The authors acknowledge that this work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement (grant number 1355438) and by the NSF KY EPSCoR Program. The authors acknowledge Solvay Novecare for providing PolarClean, Dr. Matthew Weisenburger in Center of Applied Energy Research, University of Kentucky, for his help with rheometer, and Dr. Wenxin Cao and Professor Fuqian Yang for their help on AFM. The authors acknowledge that this work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement (grant number 1355438) and by the NSF KY EPSCoR Program. The authors acknowledge Solvay Novecare for providing PolarClean, Dr. Matthew Weisenburger in Center of Applied Energy Research, University of Kentucky, for his help with rheometer, and Dr. Wenxin Cao and Professor Fuqian Yang for their help on AFM.

FinanciadoresNúmero del financiador
Kentucky-NSF EPSCoR Program
Solvay Novecare
U.S. Department of Energy Chinese Academy of Sciences Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Project Oak Ridge National Laboratory Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment National Science Foundation National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center National Natural Science Foundation of China1355438
U.S. Department of Energy Chinese Academy of Sciences Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Project Oak Ridge National Laboratory Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment National Science Foundation National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center National Natural Science Foundation of China

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Biotechnology
    • Environmental Engineering
    • General Chemical Engineering

    Huella

    Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Comparison of two low-hazard organic solvents as individual and cosolvents for the fabrication of polysulfone membranes'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

    Citar esto