Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

County-level socioeconomic status, rurality, and second primary cancer risk among breast cancer survivors in the United States

  • Katherine Ho
  • , Carolyn Brandt
  • , Jessica Li
  • , Geetanjali Datta
  • , Justin X. Moore
  • , Lene H.S. Veiga
  • , Gretchen L. Gierach
  • , Amy Berrington de González
  • , Jacqueline B. Vo
  • , Cody Ramin

Producción científica: Articlerevisión exhaustiva

2 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Background: Breast cancer survivors have an increased risk of second primary cancers (SPCs), the role of county-level socioeconomic status and rurality—factors that may influence access to treatment, surveillance, and preventive care—remains understudied. Methods: We identified 721,957 women with localized/regional first primary breast cancer who survived ≥ 1 year in 17 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries (2000–2018). We used Cox regression to assess associations between county-level median household income (proxy for socioeconomic status), rurality, and their joint effects on invasive SPC risk, adjusting for demographic and clinical factors. We examined risk for all SPCs, non-breast SPCs, and the three most common SPC sites (breast, lung/bronchus, colorectal). Models were further stratified by index breast cancer characteristics. Results: During 6.1 median years of follow-up, 65,954 survivors developed an SPC (42,400 non-breast; 23,554 breast, 8,338 lung/bronchus, 5,442 colorectal). Survivors from lower-income counties had higher SPC risk (< $50,000 vs. ≥ $75,000: HR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.04–1.10), driven by lung/bronchus (HR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.23–1.42) and colorectal cancers (HR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.09–1.31). Lung/bronchus cancer risk was stronger among younger (age < 50: HR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.59–2.39, age ≥ 50: HR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.12–1.28; p interaction < 0.001) and Estrogen Receptor (ER)-negative survivors (ER negative: HR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.31–1.72; ER positive: HR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.12–1.30; p interaction = 0.02). Survivors from rural counties had higher SPC risk compared with most urban counties (HR range:1.07–1.12), especially for lung/bronchus cancer in younger (age < 50: HR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.34–2.05, age ≥ 50: HR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.06–1.21; p interaction = 0.001) and ER-negative survivors (ER negative: HR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.26–1.67; ER positive: HR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.03–1.20; p interaction = 0.001). Survivors in rural/lower-income counties had the highest SPC risk compared with urban/higher-income counties (HR-range: 1.20–1.23), particularly for lung/bronchus cancer (HR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.10–2.23). Conclusion: Studies are needed to understand factors driving the impact of socioeconomic status and rurality (e.g., access to care) on SPC risk to inform preventive strategies for breast cancer survivors.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)1813-1824
Número de páginas12
PublicaciónCancer Causes and Control
Volumen36
N.º12
DOI
EstadoPublished - dic 2025

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.

Financiación

Open access funding provided by SCELC, Statewide California Electronic Library Consortium. This study was supported in part by Cedars-Sinai Cancer and the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health. The funder had no role in the design of the study and the collection, analysis, interpretation of the data, and in the writing of the manuscript. KH was supported in part by the NCI T32 CA009314.

FinanciadoresNúmero del financiador
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
SCELC
Statewide California Electronic Library Consortium
Cedars-Sinai Cancer
National Childhood Cancer Registry – National Cancer InstituteT32 CA009314

    ODS de las Naciones Unidas

    Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible

    1. Good health and well being
      Good health and well being

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Oncology
    • Cancer Research

    Huella

    Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'County-level socioeconomic status, rurality, and second primary cancer risk among breast cancer survivors in the United States'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

    Citar esto