Eliciting willingness to pay without bias using follow-up certainty statements: Comparisons between probably/definitely and a 10-point certainty Scale

Producción científica: Articlerevisión exhaustiva

77 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Correction for hypothetical bias using follow up certainty questions often takes one of two forms: (1) two options, "definitely sure" and "probably sure", or (2) a 10-point scale with 10 very certain. While both have been successful in eliminating hypothetical bias from estimates of WTP by calibrating based on the certainty of yes responses, little is known about the relationship between the two. The purpose of this paper is to compare the two using data from three field experiments in a private good, dichotomous choice format. We compare four types of yes responses that differ in the criterion used to determine if there is sufficient certainty for a hypothetical yes response to be considered a true yes response. We make several comparisons, but focus on determining which values on the 10-point scale give the same estimates of WTP as "definitely sure" hypothetical yeses and real yeses (actual purchases). Values that produce equivalence are near 10 on the certainty scale.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)473-502
Número de páginas30
PublicaciónEnvironmental and Resource Economics
Volumen43
N.º4
DOI
EstadoPublished - 2009

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Eliciting willingness to pay without bias using follow-up certainty statements: Comparisons between probably/definitely and a 10-point certainty Scale'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto