TY - JOUR
T1 - Endoscope-assisted approach to excision of branchial cleft cysts
AU - Teng, Stephanie E.
AU - Paul, Benjamin C.
AU - Brumm, John D.
AU - Fritz, Mark
AU - Fang, Yixin
AU - Myssiorek, David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.
PY - 2016/6/1
Y1 - 2016/6/1
N2 - Objectives/Hypothesis The purpose of this study is to describe an endoscope-assisted surgical technique for the excision of branchial cleft cysts and compare it to the standard approach. Study Design Retrospective case series review. Methods Twenty-seven cases described as branchial cleft excisions performed by a single surgeon at one academic medical center were identified between 2007 and 2014. Twenty-five cases (8 endoscopic, 17 standard approach) were included in the study. Cases were excluded if final pathology was malignant. Patient charts were reviewed, and two techniques were compared through analysis of incision size, operative time, and surgical outcomes. Results This study showed that the length of incision required for the endoscopic approach (mean = 2.13 ± 0.23) was significantly less than that of the standard approach (mean = 4.10 ± 1.46, P = 0.008) despite the fact that there was no significant difference in cyst size between the two groups (P = 0.09). The other variables examined, including operative time and surgical outcomes, were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion This transcervical endoscope-assisted approach to branchial cleft cyst excision is a viable option for uncomplicated cases. It provides better cosmetic results than the standard approach and does not negatively affect outcomes, increase operative time, or result in recurrence.
AB - Objectives/Hypothesis The purpose of this study is to describe an endoscope-assisted surgical technique for the excision of branchial cleft cysts and compare it to the standard approach. Study Design Retrospective case series review. Methods Twenty-seven cases described as branchial cleft excisions performed by a single surgeon at one academic medical center were identified between 2007 and 2014. Twenty-five cases (8 endoscopic, 17 standard approach) were included in the study. Cases were excluded if final pathology was malignant. Patient charts were reviewed, and two techniques were compared through analysis of incision size, operative time, and surgical outcomes. Results This study showed that the length of incision required for the endoscopic approach (mean = 2.13 ± 0.23) was significantly less than that of the standard approach (mean = 4.10 ± 1.46, P = 0.008) despite the fact that there was no significant difference in cyst size between the two groups (P = 0.09). The other variables examined, including operative time and surgical outcomes, were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion This transcervical endoscope-assisted approach to branchial cleft cyst excision is a viable option for uncomplicated cases. It provides better cosmetic results than the standard approach and does not negatively affect outcomes, increase operative time, or result in recurrence.
KW - Branchial cleft cyst
KW - endoscopy
KW - minimally invasive surgery
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84951834461
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84951834461&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/lary.25711
DO - 10.1002/lary.25711
M3 - Article
C2 - 26466762
AN - SCOPUS:84951834461
SN - 0023-852X
VL - 126
SP - 1339
EP - 1342
JO - Laryngoscope
JF - Laryngoscope
IS - 6
ER -