TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating functions to describe point patterns
AU - Hanberry, B.
AU - Yang, Jian
AU - He, Hong
PY - 2013/6/1
Y1 - 2013/6/1
N2 - Three functions that analyze point patterns are the L (a transformation of Ripley's K function), pair correlation, and K2 functions. We tested these functions with Genton's spatial index, which measures the distance between observed and random theoretical lines for a function over all lag distances. We simulated points from random, moderately regular, extremely regular, and clustered distributions at different density levels and a fixed plot size and for regular distributions at varying plot sizes. The spatial index clearly was able to identify clustered patterns. However, there was overlap in spatial index values between random and moderately regular distributions at lower densities. The spatial index for the L function also became more negative as plot size increased, indicating edge effects, whereas the pair correlation and K2 function values fluctuated with plot size. Using confidence envelopes rather than a spatial index, we also identified distributions other than the known distribution at low densities. These results indicate that ecologists should be cautious about 1) assigning random or regular distribution, particularly for the L function and the K2 function, 2) comparing point patterns of different densities and plot sizes, and 3) interpreting the pair correlation and K2 functions.
AB - Three functions that analyze point patterns are the L (a transformation of Ripley's K function), pair correlation, and K2 functions. We tested these functions with Genton's spatial index, which measures the distance between observed and random theoretical lines for a function over all lag distances. We simulated points from random, moderately regular, extremely regular, and clustered distributions at different density levels and a fixed plot size and for regular distributions at varying plot sizes. The spatial index clearly was able to identify clustered patterns. However, there was overlap in spatial index values between random and moderately regular distributions at lower densities. The spatial index for the L function also became more negative as plot size increased, indicating edge effects, whereas the pair correlation and K2 function values fluctuated with plot size. Using confidence envelopes rather than a spatial index, we also identified distributions other than the known distribution at low densities. These results indicate that ecologists should be cautious about 1) assigning random or regular distribution, particularly for the L function and the K2 function, 2) comparing point patterns of different densities and plot sizes, and 3) interpreting the pair correlation and K2 functions.
KW - K2 functions
KW - Pair correlation function
KW - Point pattern
KW - Ripley's K
KW - Simulation envelope
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84883608927
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883608927&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1556/ComEc.14.2013.1.1
DO - 10.1556/ComEc.14.2013.1.1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84883608927
SN - 1585-8553
VL - 14
SP - 1
EP - 7
JO - Community Ecology
JF - Community Ecology
IS - 1
ER -