Exclusive, Dual, and Polytobacco Use Among US Adults by Sociodemographic Factors: Results From 3 Nationally Representative Surveys

  • Jana L. Hirschtick
  • , Delvon T. Mattingly
  • , Beomyoung Cho
  • , Luis Zavala Arciniega
  • , David T. Levy
  • , Luz Maria Sanchez-Romero
  • , Jihyoun Jeon
  • , Stephanie R. Land
  • , Ritesh Mistry
  • , Rafael Meza
  • , Nancy L. Fleischer

Producción científica: Articlerevisión exhaustiva

33 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Purpose: To provide tobacco product use patterns for US adults by sociodemographic group. Design: A secondary analysis of Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey (2014-15), National Health Interview Survey (2015), and Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (2015-16). Setting: United States. Sample: Three nationally representative samples of adults (N = 28,070-155,067). Measures: All possible combinations of cigarette, Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS), other combustible product, and smokeless tobacco use, defined as current use every day or some days. Analysis: Weighted population prevalence and proportion among tobacco users of exclusive, dual, and polyuse patterns by sex, race/ethnicity, education, income, and age. Results: Exclusive cigarette use was the most prevalent pattern (10.9-12.8% of US population). Dual and polyuse were less prevalent at the population level (2.6-5.2% and 0.3-1.3%, respectively) but represented 16.7-25.5% of product use among tobacco users. Cigarette plus ENDS use was similar by sex, but men were more likely to be dual users of cigarettes plus other combustibles or smokeless tobacco. Among race/ethnic subgroups, non-Hispanic (NH) Whites were most likely to use cigarettes plus ENDS, while NH Blacks were most likely to use cigarettes plus other combustibles. Dual and polyuse were generally less common among adults with higher education, income, and age. Conclusion: Differences in product use patterns by sociodemographic group likely represent different risk profiles with important implications for resulting health disparities.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)377-387
Número de páginas11
PublicaciónAmerican Journal of Health Promotion
Volumen35
N.º3
DOI
EstadoPublished - mar 2021

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020.

Financiación

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health [grant number U54-CA229974]. The opinions expressed in this article are the authors’ own and do not reflect the views of the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Health and Human Services, or the United States government. The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health [grant number U54-CA229974]. The opinions expressed in this article are the authors’ own and do not reflect the views of the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Health and Human Services, or the United States government.

FinanciadoresNúmero del financiador
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
National Childhood Cancer Registry – National Cancer InstituteU54CA229974

    ODS de las Naciones Unidas

    Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible

    1. Good health and well being
      Good health and well being

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Health(social science)
    • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

    Huella

    Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Exclusive, Dual, and Polytobacco Use Among US Adults by Sociodemographic Factors: Results From 3 Nationally Representative Surveys'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

    Citar esto