Resumen
Despite long-standing concerns over self-reported measures of media use, media research has relied heavily on self-reported data. This study not only examined discrepancies between survey and logged smartphone data but assessed whether correlational outcomes using self-reported measures produce greater or smaller effect sizes compared to outcomes using logged measures. College students (n = 294) and MTurk workers (n = 291) provided self-reported and logged data of smartphone use over seven days. The correlations we examined involved four psychosocial contexts, including bridging, bonding, well-being, and problematic use of smartphones. The results showed that the effect sizes of correlations using self-reported data tend to be smaller compared to those using logged data. We believe that this is a hopeful message to the field. This could mean that extant survey results have not erroneously inflated communication findings and that communication researchers still have a lot to reveal with further refined measures.
| Idioma original | English |
|---|---|
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 346-363 |
| Número de páginas | 18 |
| Publicación | Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication |
| Volumen | 25 |
| N.º | 5 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Published - sept 1 2020 |
Nota bibliográfica
Publisher Copyright:© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Communication Association. All rights reserved.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Communication
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Good News! Communication Findings May be Underestimated: Comparing Effect Sizes with Self-Reported and Logged Smartphone Use Data'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver