Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

How does experimental pulmonary embolism decrease CO2 elimination?

  • Peter H. Breen
  • , Bhaskar Mazumdar
  • , Sean C. Skinner

Producción científica: Articlerevisión exhaustiva

15 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

To test how large pulmonary embolism changes non-steady state CO2 kinetics, the right pulmonary artery (RPA) was occluded in 5 anesthetized, ventilated, thoracotomized dogs. By 1 min after RPA occlusion, CO2 volume exhaled per breath (V(C02,br)) decreased from 9.3 ± 2.8 to 7.0 ± 2.6 ml and end-tidal P(CO2) (PET(CO2)) decreased from 28.7 ± 4.2 to 21.8 ± 3.3 Torr. During the ensuing 70 min, V(CO2,br) increased back to baseline but PET(C02) was still 13% less than baseline. Both Pa(CO2), (41.5 ± 1.7 to 55.1 ± 8.1 Torr) and PV@B(CO2) (48.2 ± 1.9 to 62.8 ± 6.5 Torr) steadily increased and approached equilibrium by 45 min of RPA occlusion. Cardiac output did not significantly change. In summary, RPA occlusion immediately decreased V(CO2,br) by 25%, due mostly to increased alveolar VD(VD(alv)). Then, V(CO2,br) recovered back to baseline as CO2 accumulated in tissues and lung. In contrast, elevated VD(alv) caused persistent decreased PET(C02), which did not detect recovery of V(C02,br) nor increase in Pa(CO2) during RPA occlusion.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)217-224
Número de páginas8
PublicaciónRespiration Physiology
Volumen105
N.º3
DOI
EstadoPublished - sept 1996

Financiación

FinanciadoresNúmero del financiador
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)R29HL042637

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Physiology
    • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

    Huella

    Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'How does experimental pulmonary embolism decrease CO2 elimination?'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

    Citar esto