Resumen
There has been a long controversy about the opinions of Aristotle and Maimonides on the best way of life for human beings. They often seem to emphasize a life based on intellectual pursuits as the highest form of existence and to deprecate more social but less rationally demanding forms of existence. This is particularly problematic for Maimonides, for it would imply that the life of a pious person is of little value unless it is combined with intellectual excellence. It is argued that this is not the view of Maimonides, and that he has enough resources in his system to show how a whole gamut of human activities and the lifestyles which go along with them are worthy of respect.
| Idioma original | English |
|---|---|
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 107-123 |
| Número de páginas | 17 |
| Publicación | American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly |
| Volumen | 76 |
| N.º | 1 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Published - dic 2002 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Religious studies
- Philosophy
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Ideals, simplicity, and ethics: The maimonidean approach'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver