Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Invasive vs conservative management of non-Q-wave myocardial infarction

Producción científica: Articlerevisión exhaustiva

Resumen

In the Veterans Affairs Non-Q-Wave Infarction Strategies in Hospital (VANQWISH) trial, most patients with non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (Ml) fared no better with early invasive management (ie, diagnostic angiography within 2 to 3 days, followed by revascularization if indicated) than with a more conservative approach (ie, radionuclide ventriculography and thallium stress testing as initial diagnostic tests). These results should not be construed to diminish the value of early diagnostic angiography, which in patients with non-Q-wave MI provides essential information for determining the need, timing, and method of revascularization. Until more information is available that incorporates contemporary practices and outcomes in patients with non-Q-wave MI, early coronary angiography should remain an acceptable method of risk stratification and should be followed by appropriate medical therapy or revascularization.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)100-104
Número de páginas5
PublicaciónCleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
Volumen66
N.º2
DOI
EstadoPublished - 1999

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Invasive vs conservative management of non-Q-wave myocardial infarction'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto