Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Is hyperaccumulation a viable hypothesis for oganic associations of minor elements in coals?

  • James C. Hower
  • , Maheteme Gebremedhin
  • , Demetrio P. Zourarakis
  • , Robert B. Finkelman
  • , David French
  • , Ian T. Graham
  • , Harold H. Schobert
  • , Lei Zhao
  • , Shifeng Dai

Producción científica: Review articlerevisión exhaustiva

28 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Plant growth requires a complex network of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and bacteria to supply organic compounds and major (C, N, P, etc.) and trace nutrients to the roots. Hyperaccumulation by certain plant species is based on the threshold ‘maxima’ a plant can safely ingest/absorb an element from soils without tissue damage. The latter criteria for hyperaccumulation vary between elements. The amount of an element a plant can absorb depends both on the ability of the species to uptake the element and on the element concentrations and bioavailability in the substrate. A plant growing directly on a mineral-rich substrate or a short height above the soil should be able to access inorganic matter via the roots. In contrast, a plant capable of accumulating inorganic elements, but growing on a peat without direct root contact with the inorganic soil fraction, would suffer a dearth of mineral nutrients. Partitioning of elements occurs within hyperaccumulators. For example, the preferential binding of heavy rare earth elements (HREE) to organic ligands leads to the relative enrichment of HREE in aerial plant structures. The presence of hyperaccumulators in a wide range of present-day plant species suggests that this mechanism was present among peat-forming plants in the fossil record. Examples from peats through low-rank coals to high volatile A bituminous coals show that hyperaccumulation provides a viable hypothesis for the consequent enrichment of certain elements. Complications from the depositional history and diagenetic alteration of the peat; metamorphism and mineralization through the history of the coal; and, not the least, the problems implicit in sampling suitable intervals in working mines, cores, natural exposures, etc., present problems in the extrapolation of the modern plant mechanisms to coals. Coal represents natural settings and, apart from Miocene and younger coals produced from vegetation with known relatives in modern setting, we cannot experiment on the ancient plants. The analogies between the geochemical appearance of coals and the element uptake and partitioning behavior of modern plants, however, does offer hope that hyperaccumulation might have been a mechanism, potentially one of many mechanisms, for the organic associations of inorganic elements in coals.

Idioma originalEnglish
Número de artículo104802
PublicaciónEarth-Science Reviews
Volumen254
DOI
EstadoPublished - jul 2024

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier B.V.

Financiación

We thank our editor, Chris Fielding, and our reviewers (Jolanta Kus, Barbara Arnold, and an anonymous reviewer; Jen O'Keefe provided valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript) for their patience in handling a mash-up of topics not typically seen together in one manuscript. This work was partially supported by Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42321002).

FinanciadoresNúmero del financiador
Science Fund for Creative Research Groups
National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)42321002
National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General Earth and Planetary Sciences

    Huella

    Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Is hyperaccumulation a viable hypothesis for oganic associations of minor elements in coals?'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

    Citar esto