Manipulation and bribery when aggregating ranked preferences

Ying Zhu, Miroslaw Truszczynski

Producción científica: Conference contributionrevisión exhaustiva

Resumen

Manipulation and bribery have received much attention from the social choice community. We study these concepts for preference formalisms that identify a set of optimal outcomes rather than a single winning outcome. We assume that preferences may be ranked (differ in importance), and we use the Pareto principle adjusted to the case of ranked preferences as the preference aggregation rule. For two important classes of preferences, representing the extreme ends of the spectrum, we provide characterizations of situations when manipulation and bribery is possible, and establish the complexity of the problems to decide that.

Idioma originalEnglish
Título de la publicación alojadaAlgorithmic Decision Theory - 4th International Conference, ADT 2015, Proceedings
EditoresToby Walsh
Páginas86-102
Número de páginas17
DOI
EstadoPublished - 2015
Evento4th International Conference on Algorithmic Decision Theory, ADT 2015 - Lexington, United States
Duración: sept 27 2015sept 30 2015

Serie de la publicación

NombreLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volumen9346
ISSN (versión impresa)0302-9743
ISSN (versión digital)1611-3349

Conference

Conference4th International Conference on Algorithmic Decision Theory, ADT 2015
País/TerritorioUnited States
CiudadLexington
Período9/27/159/30/15

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Theoretical Computer Science
  • General Computer Science

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Manipulation and bribery when aggregating ranked preferences'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto