Resumen
Manipulation and bribery have received much attention from the social choice community. We study these concepts for preference formalisms that identify a set of optimal outcomes rather than a single winning outcome. We assume that preferences may be ranked (differ in importance), and we use the Pareto principle adjusted to the case of ranked preferences as the preference aggregation rule. For two important classes of preferences, representing the extreme ends of the spectrum, we provide characterizations of situations when manipulation and bribery is possible, and establish the complexity of the problems to decide that.
| Idioma original | English |
|---|---|
| Título de la publicación alojada | Algorithmic Decision Theory - 4th International Conference, ADT 2015, Proceedings |
| Editores | Toby Walsh |
| Páginas | 86-102 |
| Número de páginas | 17 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Published - 2015 |
| Evento | 4th International Conference on Algorithmic Decision Theory, ADT 2015 - Lexington, United States Duración: sept 27 2015 → sept 30 2015 |
Serie de la publicación
| Nombre | Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) |
|---|---|
| Volumen | 9346 |
| ISSN (versión impresa) | 0302-9743 |
| ISSN (versión digital) | 1611-3349 |
Conference
| Conference | 4th International Conference on Algorithmic Decision Theory, ADT 2015 |
|---|---|
| País/Territorio | United States |
| Ciudad | Lexington |
| Período | 9/27/15 → 9/30/15 |
Nota bibliográfica
Publisher Copyright:© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Theoretical Computer Science
- General Computer Science