Resumen
Purpose: A square-wave verification bout to confirm maximal oxygen uptake (V ˙ O2max) from a graded exercise test (GXT) has been recommended. This study ascertained if a verification bout is necessary to determine V ˙ O2max in moderately trained men. Methods: Ten men (24 ± 4 years) completed familiarization and two treadmill GXTs, followed by a submaximal verification bout to determine V ˙ O2GXT and V ˙ O2verification (highest V ˙ O2 from each testing method). After completing the GXT, subjects rested for 5 min then performed a verification bout at 90% speed and 50% incline at termination of the GXT. The analyses included a 2-way repeated-measures ANOVA, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC2,1), standard errors of the measurement (SEM), minimal differences (MD), and coefficients of variation (CoV). Results: There was no test (test 1 vs test 2) × method (GXT vs verification) interaction (p = 0.584), or main effect for test (p = 0.320), but there was a main effect for method (p = 0.011). The V ˙ O2GXT (50.9±3.0 mL·kg−1·min−1) was greater than V ˙ O2verification (46.9 ± mL·kg−1·min−1). The V ˙ O2GXT (ICC = 0.988, SEM = 1.0 mL·kg−1 min−1, MD = 2.9 mL kg−1 min−1, CoV = 2.03%) and V ˙ O2verification (ICC = 0.976, SEM = 1.0 mL·kg−1 min−1, MD = 2.7 mL·kg−1·min−1, CoV = 2.03%) demonstrated “excellent” reliability. No subject exceeded the MD for V ˙ O2GXT test–retest or for V ˙ O2verification test–retest, but 50% of subjects had a V ˙ O2GXT that was greater than the V ˙ O2verification (> MD). Conclusion: While V ˙ O2GXT and V ˙ O2verification demonstrated excellent reliability, V ˙ O2GXT from a stand-alone GXT provided higher estimates of V ˙ O2 and, therefore, should be considered V ˙ O2max. The lack of test–retest differences in V ˙ O2GXT above the MD indicated that subjects achieved their highest V ˙ O2 (V ˙ O2max) from a standalone GXT. Therefore, the verification bout may not be required to confirm V ˙ O2max in this population.
| Idioma original | English |
|---|---|
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 191-199 |
| Número de páginas | 9 |
| Publicación | European Journal of Applied Physiology |
| Volumen | 123 |
| N.º | 1 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Published - ene 2023 |
Nota bibliográfica
Publisher Copyright:© 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Financiación
This study was supported by the University’s Departmental Student Research Award.
ODS de las Naciones Unidas
Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible
-
Good health and well being
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Physiology (medical)
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Methodological considerations for the determination of VO2max in healthy men'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver