Resumen
In the wake of Europe's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), research ethics governance does not just affect the ethical dimensions of social research but also the range of scientific decisions available to researchers. Because of the sensitive status of personal data and the aversion to even minimal risk by what we call “moral bureaucracies”, we are concerned that social network researchers will increasingly limit their research decisions to “safe” options, like reusing anonymized datasets, choosing target populations based on convenience rather than theoretical relevance, and routinely subcontracting fieldwork to professional data collection companies, among others. We also suggest that scientific associations and social scientists in general need to adopt a proactive role in preserving both scientific freedom and genuine ethics advice within this new regulatory framework.
| Idioma original | English |
|---|---|
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 13-19 |
| Número de páginas | 7 |
| Publicación | Social Networks |
| Volumen | 67 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Published - oct 2021 |
Nota bibliográfica
Publisher Copyright:© 2019 Elsevier B.V.
Financiación
We want to thank Paola Tubaro, Louise Ryan, Antonio Casilli, Alessio D'Angelo, Bernie Hogan, Elise Penalva-Icher, and Guillaume Favre for their kind invitation to participate in the RECSNA17: Recent Ethical Challenges in Social Network Analysis, 5-6 Dec 2017 Paris, and the successful discussions that took place during the sessions. Last but not least, we want to thank Miranda Lubbers her valuable suggestions for improving this paper.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Anthropology
- Sociology and Political Science
- General Social Sciences
- General Psychology
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Moral bureaucracies and social network research'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver