Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

NRG Oncology/RTOG1205: A Randomized Phase II Trial of Concurrent Bevacizumab and Reirradiation Versus Bevacizumab Alone as Treatment for Recurrent Glioblastoma

  • Christina I. Tsien
  • , Stephanie L. Pugh
  • , Adam P. Dicker
  • , Jeffrey J. Raizer
  • , Martha M. Matuszak
  • , Enrico C. Lallana
  • , Jiayi Huang
  • , Ozer Algan
  • , Nimisha Deb
  • , Lorraine Portelance
  • , John L. Villano
  • , John T. Hamm
  • , Kevin S. Oh
  • , Arif N. Ali
  • , Michelle M. Kim
  • , Scott M. Lindhorst
  • , Minesh P. Mehta

Producción científica: Articlerevisión exhaustiva

180 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

PURPOSETo assess whether reirradiation (re-RT) and concurrent bevacizumab (BEV) improve overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS), compared with BEV alone in recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). The primary objective was OS, and secondary objectives included PFS, response rate, and treatment adverse events (AEs) including delayed CNS toxicities.METHODSNRG Oncology/RTOG1205 is a prospective, phase II, randomized trial of re-RT and BEV versus BEV alone. Stratification factors included age, resection, and Karnofsky performance status (KPS). Patients with recurrent GBM with imaging evidence of tumor progression ≥ 6 months from completion of prior chemo-RT were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to re-RT, 35 Gy in 10 fractions, with concurrent BEV IV 10 mg/kg once in every 2 weeks or BEV alone until progression.RESULTSFrom December 2012 to April 2016, 182 patients were randomly assigned, of whom 170 were eligible. Patient characteristics were well balanced between arms. The median follow-up for censored patients was 12.8 months. There was no improvement in OS for BEV + RT, hazard ratio, 0.98; 80% CI, 0.79 to 1.23; P =.46; the median survival time was 10.1 versus 9.7 months for BEV + RT versus BEV alone. The median PFS for BEV + RT was 7.1 versus 3.8 months for BEV, hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53 to 1.0; P =.05. The 6-month PFS rate improved from 29.1% (95% CI, 19.1 to 39.1) for BEV to 54.3% (95% CI, 43.5 to 65.1) for BEV + RT, P =.001. Treatment was well tolerated. There were a 5% rate of acute grade 3+ treatment-related AEs and no delayed high-grade AEs. Most patients died of recurrent GBM.CONCLUSIONTo our knowledge, NRG Oncology/RTOG1205 is the first prospective, randomized multi-institutional study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of re-RT in recurrent GBM using modern RT techniques. Overall, re-RT was shown to be safe and well tolerated. BEV + RT demonstrated a clinically meaningful improvement in PFS, specifically the 6-month PFS rate but no difference in OS.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)1285-1295
Número de páginas11
PublicaciónJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volumen41
N.º6
DOI
EstadoPublished - feb 20 2023

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© American Society of Clinical Oncology.

ODS de las Naciones Unidas

Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible

  1. Good health and well being
    Good health and well being

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'NRG Oncology/RTOG1205: A Randomized Phase II Trial of Concurrent Bevacizumab and Reirradiation Versus Bevacizumab Alone as Treatment for Recurrent Glioblastoma'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto