Resumen
OBJECTIVES: To engage critical care end-users (survivors and caregivers) to describe their emotions and experiences across their recovery trajectory, and elicit their ideas and solutions for health service improvements to improve the ICU recovery experience. DESIGN: End-user engagement as part of a qualitative design using the Framework Analysis method. SETTING: The Society of Critical Care Medicine’s THRIVE international collaborative sites (follow-up clinics and peer support groups). SUBJECTS: Patients and caregivers following critical illness and identified through the collaboratives. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Eighty-six interviews were conducted. The following themes were identified: 1) Emotions and experiences of patients—“Loss of former self; Experiences of disability and adaptation”; 2) Emotions and experiences of caregivers—“Emotional impacts, adopting new roles, and caregiver burden; Influence of gender roles; Adaptation, adjustment, recalibration”; and 3) Patient and caregiver-generated solutions to improve recovery across the arc of care—“Family-targeted education; Expectation management; Rehabilitation for patients and caregivers; Peer support groups; Reconnecting with ICU post-discharge; Access to community-based supports post-discharge; Psychological support; Education of issues of ICU survivorship for health professionals; Support across recovery trajectory.” Themes were mapped to a previously published recovery framework (Timing It Right) that captures patient and caregiver experiences and their support needs across the phases of care from the event/diagnosis to adaptation post-discharge home. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and caregivers reported a range of emotions and experiences across the recovery trajectory from ICU to home. Through end-user engagement strategies many potential solutions were identified that could be implemented by health services and tested to support the delivery of higher-quality care for ICU survivors and their caregivers that extend from tertiary to primary care settings.
| Idioma original | English |
|---|---|
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 1778-1787 |
| Número de páginas | 10 |
| Publicación | Critical Care Medicine |
| Volumen | 50 |
| N.º | 12 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Published - dic 1 2022 |
Nota bibliográfica
Publisher Copyright:Copyright © 2022 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Financiación
Drs. Haines’, Quasim’s, McPeake’s, and Sevin’s institutions received funding from the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM). Dr. Boehm’s institution received funding from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); she is funded by National Institutes of Health (NIH)/NHLBI (K12 HL137943) as is Dr. Iwashyna (K12 HL138039). Drs. Boehm and Jackson received support for article research from NIH. Dr. Hope received funding from the American Association of Critical Care Nurses. Dr. Netzer received funding from UptoDate and Springer Press. Dr. Hopkins’ institution received funding from Intermountain Research and Medical Foundation. Dr. Iwashyna disclosed government work. Dr. McPeake’s institution received funding from The University of Cambridge; she is funded by a THIS Institute Post-Doctoral Fellowship (PD-2019-02-16). Dr. Sevin received support for article research from the Department of Defense. Drs. Haines, Boehm, Quasim, McPeake, and Sevin received funding from SCCM to undertake this work. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest. This study was funded by the Society of Critical Care Medicine. The scientific questions, analytical framework, data collection, and analyses were undertaken independently of the funder.
| Financiadores | Número del financiador |
|---|---|
| THIS Institute | PD-2019-02-16 |
| National Institutes of Health (NIH) | K12 HL138039 |
| National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) | K12HL137943 |
| Society of Critical Care Medicine | |
| Intermountain Research and Medical Foundation | |
| American Association of Critical-Care Nurses | |
| Cambridge University |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Patient and Caregiver-Derived Health Service Improvements for Better Critical Care Recovery'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver