Perceptions of plea bargains for driving under the influence (DUI) cases involving alcohol and marijuana

J. Matthew Webster, Jonathan M. Golding, Sarah E. Malik, Andrea M. Riederer

Producción científica: Articlerevisión exhaustiva

4 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Two experiments investigated plea bargains in a mock driving under the influence (DUI) case. In each experiment, participants (78 [47 females and 31 males] in Experiment 1 and 92 [48 females and 44 males] in Experiment 2) read vignettes describing a plea bargain in a DUI case. Both experiments employed a within-subjects design: Type of Substance (alcohol vs. marijuana), Type of Plea Bargain Agreement (minimum time of suspended license vs. median time of suspended license), and Number of DUI Arrests (1 DUI arrest vs. 2 DUI arrests in a 10-year period [Experiment 1] or 1-year period [Experiment 2]). The results showed less support for plea bargains when the DUI case: (a) involved alcohol, (b) involved a minimum time of suspended license, and (c) involved two DUI arrests in a 1-year period. The results are discussed in terms of procedural justice theory and the impact of the general public’s perceptions of plea bargains as a legal tool.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)950-966
Número de páginas17
PublicaciónPsychology, Crime and Law
Volumen26
N.º10
DOI
EstadoPublished - nov 25 2020

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • General Psychology
  • Law

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Perceptions of plea bargains for driving under the influence (DUI) cases involving alcohol and marijuana'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto