Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Pharmacy educators' experience and views on academic dishonesty

Producción científica: Articlerevisión exhaustiva

1 Cita (Scopus)

Resumen

Objectives: To determine faculty experiences with and perceptions of academic dishonesty and if there are inconsistencies in interpretation and handling of such violations. Methods: Faculty members within two departments at a college of pharmacy were surveyed to collect their experiences with and perceptions of academic dishonesty. These faculty were also asked to interpret and respond to potential violations via hypothetical case scenarios. Results: Of the 46 faculty members who participated in the survey, 75% reported having never experienced an Honor Code violation. Most respondents agreed that it is the responsibility of the faculty member to address every alleged Honor Code violation (95.3%) and that violations should be handled consistently (97.7%). Few respondents (34.9%) indicated that they have had adequate mentoring and training in handling situations of academic dishonesty. Most faculty respondents identified each hypothetical scenario as an Honor Code violation but reported a variety of methods to manage these potential violations. Conclusions: Faculty at one college of pharmacy, reported minimal academic dishonesty experience, but have congruent beliefs on what Honor Code violations are and how they should be handled. However, methods chosen for managing hypothetical and real violations varied widely. A uniform process for managing violations should be considered to reduce academic dishonesty in pharmacy education.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)185-193
Número de páginas9
PublicaciónCurrents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
Volumen6
N.º2
DOI
EstadoPublished - mar 2014

Nota bibliográfica

Funding Information:
The survey administration tool described (REDCap) was supported by the National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through Grant 8UL1TR000117-02. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Financiación

The survey administration tool described (REDCap) was supported by the National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through Grant 8UL1TR000117-02. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

FinanciadoresNúmero del financiador
National Institutes of Health (NIH)8UL1TR000117-02
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
National Center for Research Resources
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Pharmacy
    • General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics

    Huella

    Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Pharmacy educators' experience and views on academic dishonesty'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

    Citar esto