Preventability and causes of readmissions in a national cohort of general medicine patients

Andrew D. Auerbach, Sunil Kripalani, Eduard E. Vasilevskis, Neil Sehgal, Peter K. Lindenauer, Joshua P. Metlay, Grant Fletcher, Gregory W. Ruhnke, Scott A. Flanders, Christopher Kim, Mark V. Williams, Larissa Thomas, Vernon Giang, Shoshana J. Herzig, Kanan Patel, W. John Boscardin, Edmondo J. Robinson, Jeffrey L. Schnipper

Producción científica: Articlerevisión exhaustiva

301 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

IMPORTANCE: Readmission penalties have catalyzed efforts to improve care transitions, but few programs have incorporated viewpoints of patients and health care professionals to determine readmission preventability or to prioritize opportunities for care improvement. OBJECTIVES: To determine preventability of readmissions and to use these estimates to prioritize areas for improvement. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An observational studywas conducted of 1000 general medicine patients readmitted within 30 days of discharge to 12 US academic medical centers between April 1, 2012, and March 31, 2013.We surveyed patients and physicians, reviewed documentation, and performed 2-physician case review to determine preventability of and factors contributing to readmission.We used bivariable statistics to compare preventable and nonpreventable readmissions, multivariable models to identify factors associated with potential preventability, and baseline risk factor prevalence and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) to determine the proportion of readmissions affected by individual risk factors. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: Likelihood that a readmission could have been prevented. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 1000 patients (median age was 55 years). Of these, 269 (26.9%) were considered potentially preventable. In multivariable models, factors most strongly associated with potential preventability included emergency department decision making regarding the readmission (aOR, 9.13; 95%CI, 5.23-15.95), failure to relay important information to outpatient health care professionals (aOR, 4.19; 95%CI, 2.17-8.09), discharge of patients too soon (aOR, 3.88; 95%CI, 2.44-6.17), and lack of discussions about care goals among patients with serious illnesses (aOR, 3.84; 95%CI, 1.39-10.64). The most common factors associated with potentially preventable readmissions included emergency department decision making (affecting 9.0%; 95%CI, 7.1%-10.3%), inability to keep appointments after discharge (affecting 8.3%; 95%CI, 4.1%-12.0%), premature discharge from the hospital (affecting 8.7%; 95%CI, 5.8%-11.3%), and patient lack of awareness of whom to contact after discharge (affecting 6.2%; 95%CI, 3.5%-8.7%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Approximately one-quarter of readmissions are potentially preventable when assessed using multiple perspectives. High-priority areas for improvement efforts include improved communication among health care teams and between health care professionals and patients, greater attention to patients' readiness for discharge, enhanced disease monitoring, and better support for patient self-management.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)484-493
Número de páginas10
PublicaciónJAMA Internal Medicine
Volumen176
N.º4
DOI
EstadoPublished - abr 2016

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Financiación

Dr Auerbach is supported by grant K24HL098372 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. This work was supported by an unrestricted research grant from the American Association of Medical Colleges and in part by grant 2 UL1 TR000445-06 from the National Institute on Aging.

FinanciadoresNúmero del financiador
National Institute on Aging
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Blood Pressure ProgramK24HL098372
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Blood Pressure Program
Association of American Medical Colleges2 UL1 TR000445-06
Association of American Medical Colleges
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)UL1TR000445
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Internal Medicine

    Huella

    Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Preventability and causes of readmissions in a national cohort of general medicine patients'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

    Citar esto