Process and technoeconomic analysis of leading pretreatment technologies for lignocellulosic ethanol production using switchgrass

Ling Tao; Andy Aden; Richard T. Elander; Venkata Ramesh Pallapolu; Y. Y. Lee; Rebecca J. Garlock; Venkatesh Balan; Bruce E. Dale; Youngmi Kim; Nathan S. Mosier; Michael R. Ladisch; Matthew Falls; Mark T. Holtzapple; Rocio Sierra; Jian Shi; Mirvat A. Ebrik; Tim Redmond; Bin Yang; Charles E. Wyman; Bonnie Hames; Steve Thomas; Ryan E. Warner

doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.051

Process and technoeconomic analysis of leading pretreatment technologies for lignocellulosic ethanol production using switchgrass

Ling Tao
, Andy Aden
, Richard T. Elander
, Venkata Ramesh Pallapolu
, Y. Y. Lee
, Rebecca J. Garlock
, Venkatesh Balan
, Bruce E. Dale
, Youngmi Kim
, Nathan S. Mosier
, Michael R. Ladisch
, Matthew Falls
, Mark T. Holtzapple
, Rocio Sierra
, Jian Shi
, Mirvat A. Ebrik
, Tim Redmond
, Bin Yang
, Charles E. Wyman
, Bonnie Hames

Steve Thomas, Ryan E. Warner

Producción científica: Article › revisión exhaustiva

273 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Six biomass pretreatment processes to convert switchgrass to fermentable sugars and ultimately to cellulosic ethanol are compared on a consistent basis in this technoeconomic analysis. The six pretreatment processes are ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX), dilute acid (DA), lime, liquid hot water (LHW), soaking in aqueous ammonia (SAA), and sulfur dioxide-impregnated steam explosion (SO ₂). Each pretreatment process is modeled in the framework of an existing biochemical design model so that systematic variations of process-related changes are consistently captured. The pretreatment area process design and simulation are based on the research data generated within the Biomass Refining Consortium for Applied Fundamentals and Innovation (CAFI) 3 project. Overall ethanol production, total capital investment, and minimum ethanol selling price (MESP) are reported along with selected sensitivity analysis. The results show limited differentiation between the projected economic performances of the pretreatment options, except for processes that exhibit significantly lower monomer sugar and resulting ethanol yields.

Idioma original	English
Páginas (desde-hasta)	11105-11114
Número de páginas	10
Publicación	Bioresource Technology
Volumen	102
N.º	24
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.051
Estado	Published - dic 2011

Nota bibliográfica

Funding Information:
This research was funded under the Office of the Biomass Program of the United States Department of Energy through Contract No. DE-FG36-04GO14017. We would like to acknowledge all the generous help from each CAFI 3 project PI to establish the design basis for each pretreatment method.

Financiación

This research was funded under the Office of the Biomass Program of the United States Department of Energy through Contract No. DE-FG36-04GO14017. We would like to acknowledge all the generous help from each CAFI 3 project PI to establish the design basis for each pretreatment method.

Financiadores	Número del financiador
U.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge National Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy National Science Foundation National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center	DE-FG36-04GO14017
U.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge National Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy National Science Foundation National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center

ODS de las Naciones Unidas

Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible

Affordable and clean energy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Bioengineering
Environmental Engineering
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Waste Management and Disposal

Acceder al documento

10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.051

Otros archivos y enlaces

Citar esto

Tao, L., Aden, A., Elander, R. T., Pallapolu, V. R., Lee, Y. Y., Garlock, R. J., Balan, V., Dale, B. E., Kim, Y., Mosier, N. S., Ladisch, M. R., Falls, M., Holtzapple, M. T., Sierra, R., Shi, J., Ebrik, M. A., Redmond, T., Yang, B., Wyman, C. E., ... Warner, R. E. (2011). Process and technoeconomic analysis of leading pretreatment technologies for lignocellulosic ethanol production using switchgrass. Bioresource Technology, 102(24), 11105-11114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.051

@article{c8dcf73e5390463fb3eb2dc4227b8468,

title = "Process and technoeconomic analysis of leading pretreatment technologies for lignocellulosic ethanol production using switchgrass",

abstract = "Six biomass pretreatment processes to convert switchgrass to fermentable sugars and ultimately to cellulosic ethanol are compared on a consistent basis in this technoeconomic analysis. The six pretreatment processes are ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX), dilute acid (DA), lime, liquid hot water (LHW), soaking in aqueous ammonia (SAA), and sulfur dioxide-impregnated steam explosion (SO 2). Each pretreatment process is modeled in the framework of an existing biochemical design model so that systematic variations of process-related changes are consistently captured. The pretreatment area process design and simulation are based on the research data generated within the Biomass Refining Consortium for Applied Fundamentals and Innovation (CAFI) 3 project. Overall ethanol production, total capital investment, and minimum ethanol selling price (MESP) are reported along with selected sensitivity analysis. The results show limited differentiation between the projected economic performances of the pretreatment options, except for processes that exhibit significantly lower monomer sugar and resulting ethanol yields.",

keywords = "Biomass, Enzymatic hydrolysis, Pretreatment, Process economics, Switchgrass",

author = "Ling Tao and Andy Aden and Elander, \{Richard T.\} and Pallapolu, \{Venkata Ramesh\} and Lee, \{Y. Y.\} and Garlock, \{Rebecca J.\} and Venkatesh Balan and Dale, \{Bruce E.\} and Youngmi Kim and Mosier, \{Nathan S.\} and Ladisch, \{Michael R.\} and Matthew Falls and Holtzapple, \{Mark T.\} and Rocio Sierra and Jian Shi and Ebrik, \{Mirvat A.\} and Tim Redmond and Bin Yang and Wyman, \{Charles E.\} and Bonnie Hames and Steve Thomas and Warner, \{Ryan E.\}",

note = "Funding Information: This research was funded under the Office of the Biomass Program of the United States Department of Energy through Contract No. DE-FG36-04GO14017. We would like to acknowledge all the generous help from each CAFI 3 project PI to establish the design basis for each pretreatment method.",

year = "2011",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.051",

language = "English",

volume = "102",

pages = "11105--11114",

number = "24",

}

Tao, L, Aden, A, Elander, RT, Pallapolu, VR, Lee, YY, Garlock, RJ, Balan, V, Dale, BE, Kim, Y, Mosier, NS, Ladisch, MR, Falls, M, Holtzapple, MT, Sierra, R, Shi, J, Ebrik, MA, Redmond, T, Yang, B, Wyman, CE, Hames, B, Thomas, S & Warner, RE 2011, 'Process and technoeconomic analysis of leading pretreatment technologies for lignocellulosic ethanol production using switchgrass', Bioresource Technology, vol. 102, n.º 24, pp. 11105-11114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.051

TY - JOUR

T1 - Process and technoeconomic analysis of leading pretreatment technologies for lignocellulosic ethanol production using switchgrass

AU - Tao, Ling

AU - Aden, Andy

AU - Elander, Richard T.

AU - Pallapolu, Venkata Ramesh

AU - Lee, Y. Y.

AU - Garlock, Rebecca J.

AU - Balan, Venkatesh

AU - Dale, Bruce E.

AU - Kim, Youngmi

AU - Mosier, Nathan S.

AU - Ladisch, Michael R.

AU - Falls, Matthew

AU - Holtzapple, Mark T.

AU - Sierra, Rocio

AU - Shi, Jian

AU - Ebrik, Mirvat A.

AU - Redmond, Tim

AU - Yang, Bin

AU - Wyman, Charles E.

AU - Hames, Bonnie

AU - Thomas, Steve

AU - Warner, Ryan E.

N1 - Funding Information: This research was funded under the Office of the Biomass Program of the United States Department of Energy through Contract No. DE-FG36-04GO14017. We would like to acknowledge all the generous help from each CAFI 3 project PI to establish the design basis for each pretreatment method.

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - Six biomass pretreatment processes to convert switchgrass to fermentable sugars and ultimately to cellulosic ethanol are compared on a consistent basis in this technoeconomic analysis. The six pretreatment processes are ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX), dilute acid (DA), lime, liquid hot water (LHW), soaking in aqueous ammonia (SAA), and sulfur dioxide-impregnated steam explosion (SO 2). Each pretreatment process is modeled in the framework of an existing biochemical design model so that systematic variations of process-related changes are consistently captured. The pretreatment area process design and simulation are based on the research data generated within the Biomass Refining Consortium for Applied Fundamentals and Innovation (CAFI) 3 project. Overall ethanol production, total capital investment, and minimum ethanol selling price (MESP) are reported along with selected sensitivity analysis. The results show limited differentiation between the projected economic performances of the pretreatment options, except for processes that exhibit significantly lower monomer sugar and resulting ethanol yields.

AB - Six biomass pretreatment processes to convert switchgrass to fermentable sugars and ultimately to cellulosic ethanol are compared on a consistent basis in this technoeconomic analysis. The six pretreatment processes are ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX), dilute acid (DA), lime, liquid hot water (LHW), soaking in aqueous ammonia (SAA), and sulfur dioxide-impregnated steam explosion (SO 2). Each pretreatment process is modeled in the framework of an existing biochemical design model so that systematic variations of process-related changes are consistently captured. The pretreatment area process design and simulation are based on the research data generated within the Biomass Refining Consortium for Applied Fundamentals and Innovation (CAFI) 3 project. Overall ethanol production, total capital investment, and minimum ethanol selling price (MESP) are reported along with selected sensitivity analysis. The results show limited differentiation between the projected economic performances of the pretreatment options, except for processes that exhibit significantly lower monomer sugar and resulting ethanol yields.

KW - Biomass

KW - Enzymatic hydrolysis

KW - Pretreatment

KW - Process economics

KW - Switchgrass

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/81555208661

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/81555208661#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.051

DO - 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.051

M3 - Article

C2 - 21865030

AN - SCOPUS:81555208661

SN - 0960-8524

VL - 102

SP - 11105

EP - 11114

JO - Bioresource Technology

JF - Bioresource Technology

IS - 24

ER -

Process and technoeconomic analysis of leading pretreatment technologies for lignocellulosic ethanol production using switchgrass

Resumen

Nota bibliográfica

Financiación

ODS de las Naciones Unidas

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Acceder al documento

Otros archivos y enlaces

Huella

Citar esto