Program, Policy and Social Support Characteristics Associated With Rural vs. Urban Recovery Housing, 2018–2020

Angela Lynn Kirby; Amber Lynn Kizewski; Robin Anne Thompson; Madison Ashworth; Terry Lee Bunn

doi:10.1177/00220426221114018

Program, Policy and Social Support Characteristics Associated With Rural vs. Urban Recovery Housing, 2018–2020

Angela Lynn Kirby
, Amber Lynn Kizewski
, Robin Anne Thompson
, Madison Ashworth
, Terry Lee Bunn

Producción científica: Article › revisión exhaustiva

3 Citas (SciVal)

Resumen

Study objectives were to survey rural and urban recovery house owners/operators on their existing National Alliance for Recovery Residences-like (NARR-like) house programs/policies, and delineate rural–urban differences to raise awareness of NARR standards that align with current recovery house policies/programs and to inform new/enhance existing NARR standards. An electronic survey was developed and disseminated to 112 identified recovery houses in Kentucky. There was a 77% survey response rate. Rural recovery houses were more likely to have provisions in place for persons with disabilities, require clinical services participation, and have a stricter return-to-use policy. Work and/or school requirements in recovery houses were associated with resident stability and house expectations for community integration. Understanding differences in existing NARR-like rural versus urban recovery house policies and programs is necessary to raise state-led NARR affiliate awareness of differential recovery house training and support service needs that can best ready recovery houses for NARR certification.

Idioma original	English
Páginas (desde-hasta)	280-295
Número de páginas	16
Publicación	Journal of Drug Issues
Volumen	53
N.º	2
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1177/00220426221114018
Estado	Published - abr 2023

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022.

Financiación

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This project was supported by the Kentucky Opioid Response Effort through a Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Grant 1H79TI081704, and by a Health Resources and Services Administration grant, award number UD9RH33631-01–00. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessary represent the official views of HRSA.

Financiadores	Número del financiador
Kentucky Opioid Response Effort	1H79TI081704
Health Resources and Services Administration	UD9RH33631-01–00

ODS de las Naciones Unidas

Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible

Good health and well being
Sustainable cities and communities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Health(social science)
Medicine (miscellaneous)
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Psychiatry and Mental health

Acceder al documento

10.1177/00220426221114018

Otros archivos y enlaces

Citar esto

@article{cb2b57b78a094b939194363a330c0492,

title = "Program, Policy and Social Support Characteristics Associated With Rural vs. Urban Recovery Housing, 2018–2020",

abstract = "Study objectives were to survey rural and urban recovery house owners/operators on their existing National Alliance for Recovery Residences-like (NARR-like) house programs/policies, and delineate rural–urban differences to raise awareness of NARR standards that align with current recovery house policies/programs and to inform new/enhance existing NARR standards. An electronic survey was developed and disseminated to 112 identified recovery houses in Kentucky. There was a 77\% survey response rate. Rural recovery houses were more likely to have provisions in place for persons with disabilities, require clinical services participation, and have a stricter return-to-use policy. Work and/or school requirements in recovery houses were associated with resident stability and house expectations for community integration. Understanding differences in existing NARR-like rural versus urban recovery house policies and programs is necessary to raise state-led NARR affiliate awareness of differential recovery house training and support service needs that can best ready recovery houses for NARR certification.",

keywords = "disabilities accommodations, employment, recovery house, return-to-use policies, rural",

author = "Kirby, \{Angela Lynn\} and Kizewski, \{Amber Lynn\} and Thompson, \{Robin Anne\} and Madison Ashworth and \{Lee Bunn\}, Terry",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2022.",

year = "2023",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1177/00220426221114018",

language = "English",

volume = "53",

pages = "280--295",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Program, Policy and Social Support Characteristics Associated With Rural vs. Urban Recovery Housing, 2018–2020

AU - Kirby, Angela Lynn

AU - Kizewski, Amber Lynn

AU - Thompson, Robin Anne

AU - Ashworth, Madison

AU - Lee Bunn, Terry

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2022.

PY - 2023/4

Y1 - 2023/4

N2 - Study objectives were to survey rural and urban recovery house owners/operators on their existing National Alliance for Recovery Residences-like (NARR-like) house programs/policies, and delineate rural–urban differences to raise awareness of NARR standards that align with current recovery house policies/programs and to inform new/enhance existing NARR standards. An electronic survey was developed and disseminated to 112 identified recovery houses in Kentucky. There was a 77% survey response rate. Rural recovery houses were more likely to have provisions in place for persons with disabilities, require clinical services participation, and have a stricter return-to-use policy. Work and/or school requirements in recovery houses were associated with resident stability and house expectations for community integration. Understanding differences in existing NARR-like rural versus urban recovery house policies and programs is necessary to raise state-led NARR affiliate awareness of differential recovery house training and support service needs that can best ready recovery houses for NARR certification.

AB - Study objectives were to survey rural and urban recovery house owners/operators on their existing National Alliance for Recovery Residences-like (NARR-like) house programs/policies, and delineate rural–urban differences to raise awareness of NARR standards that align with current recovery house policies/programs and to inform new/enhance existing NARR standards. An electronic survey was developed and disseminated to 112 identified recovery houses in Kentucky. There was a 77% survey response rate. Rural recovery houses were more likely to have provisions in place for persons with disabilities, require clinical services participation, and have a stricter return-to-use policy. Work and/or school requirements in recovery houses were associated with resident stability and house expectations for community integration. Understanding differences in existing NARR-like rural versus urban recovery house policies and programs is necessary to raise state-led NARR affiliate awareness of differential recovery house training and support service needs that can best ready recovery houses for NARR certification.

KW - disabilities accommodations

KW - employment

KW - recovery house

KW - return-to-use policies

KW - rural

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85134345473

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85134345473#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1177/00220426221114018

DO - 10.1177/00220426221114018

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85134345473

SN - 0022-0426

VL - 53

SP - 280

EP - 295

JO - Journal of Drug Issues

JF - Journal of Drug Issues

IS - 2

ER -

Program, Policy and Social Support Characteristics Associated With Rural vs. Urban Recovery Housing, 2018–2020

Resumen

Nota bibliográfica

Financiación

ODS de las Naciones Unidas

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Acceder al documento

Otros archivos y enlaces

Huella

Citar esto