TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantitative analysis of state transportation agency's experience with constructability reviews
AU - Stamatiadis, Nikiforos
AU - Goodrum, Paul
AU - Shocklee, Emily
AU - Wang, Chen
PY - 2014/2/1
Y1 - 2014/2/1
N2 - The project development process aims to deliver the most appropriate roadway project given its context. Past work has shown that significant gains are realized when construction expertise is integrated early and throughout the project-delivery process. The Kentucky Transportation Cabinet has initiated a process that reviews design documents prior to construction to address issues that may result in time delays and cost increases. However, these efforts are not utilizing a systematic review process that would allow detailed documentation of the issues identified and provide a lessons-learned database for future use. The study undertaken classifies the constructability issues that typically impact highway construction projects. This paper first identifies the common constructability categories through a national review and then quantifies the frequency and severity of constructability issues by comment type and category, review year, reviewer, and comment severity. The paper's primary contribution to the body of knowledge is the determination that constructability issues are dynamic and change over time, there is a need for consistency among reviewers, and that team reviews are more appropriate than a single-reviewer approach.
AB - The project development process aims to deliver the most appropriate roadway project given its context. Past work has shown that significant gains are realized when construction expertise is integrated early and throughout the project-delivery process. The Kentucky Transportation Cabinet has initiated a process that reviews design documents prior to construction to address issues that may result in time delays and cost increases. However, these efforts are not utilizing a systematic review process that would allow detailed documentation of the issues identified and provide a lessons-learned database for future use. The study undertaken classifies the constructability issues that typically impact highway construction projects. This paper first identifies the common constructability categories through a national review and then quantifies the frequency and severity of constructability issues by comment type and category, review year, reviewer, and comment severity. The paper's primary contribution to the body of knowledge is the determination that constructability issues are dynamic and change over time, there is a need for consistency among reviewers, and that team reviews are more appropriate than a single-reviewer approach.
KW - Constructability reviews
KW - Plan reviewers
KW - Project design
KW - Project planning and design
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84892936968
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892936968&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000787
DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000787
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84892936968
SN - 0733-9364
VL - 140
JO - Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
JF - Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
IS - 2
M1 - 04013043
ER -