Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Redistricting and Incarceration: Examining the Electoral Consequences of New York's Prohibition on Prison Gerrymandering

Producción científica: Articlerevisión exhaustiva

4 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

During the most recent round of redistricting, many states have enacted a number of reforms to their mapmaking practices. One reform that has received increased attention in recent years is a ban on prison gerrymandering - the practice of counting incarcerated individuals in prisons instead of their home addresses. Eleven states drew districts while counting incarcerated persons in their homes after the 2020 Census. Though substantial research has investigated redistricting practices, far less attention has been paid to empirically examining the effect of prison gerrymandering on elections. We seek to fill this void by evaluating the effect of New York's ban on prison gerrymandering on state legislative elections between 2002 and 2020. We find that altering how the prison population is counted, indeed, altered the electoral dynamics across the state.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)418-437
Número de páginas20
PublicaciónState Politics and Policy Quarterly
Volumen22
N.º4
DOI
EstadoPublished - dic 28 2022

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press and State Politics & Policy Quarterly.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Political Science and International Relations

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Redistricting and Incarceration: Examining the Electoral Consequences of New York's Prohibition on Prison Gerrymandering'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto