Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Reduced prevalence of vulvar HPV16/18 infection among women who received the HPV16/18 bivalent vaccine: A nested analysis within the Costa Rica Vaccine Trial

  • Krystle A.Lang Kuhs
  • , Paula Gonzalez
  • , Ana Cecilia Rodriguez
  • , Leen Jan Van Doorn
  • , Mark Schiffman
  • , Linda Struijk
  • , Sabrina Chen
  • , Wim Quint
  • , Douglas R. Lowy
  • , Carolina Porras
  • , Corey Delvecchio
  • , Silvia Jimenez
  • , Mahboobeh Safaeian
  • , John T. Schiller
  • , Sholom Wacholder
  • , Rolando Herrero
  • , Allan Hildesheim
  • , Aimée R. Kreimer
  • , Mario Alfaro
  • , Manuel Barrantes
  • M. Concepción Bratti, Fernando Cárdenas, Bernal Cortés, Albert Espinoza, Yenory Estrada, Diego Guillén, Silvia E. Jiménez, Jorge Morales, Luis Villegas, Lidia Ana Morera, Elmer Pérez, Libia Rivas, Enrique Freer, José Bonilla, Alfanso García-Piñeres, Sandra Silva, Ivannia Atmella, Margarita Ramírez, Nora Macklin, Mark Sherman, Diane Solomon, Ligia Pinto, Troy Kemp, Claire Eklund, Martha Hutchinson, Mary Sidawy

Producción científica: Articlerevisión exhaustiva

18 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Background: Vaccine efficacy (VE) against vulvar human papillomavirus (HPV) infection has not been reported and data regarding its epidemiology are sparse. Methods: Women (n = 5404) age 22-29 present at the 4-year study visit of the Costa Rica Vaccine Trial provided vulvar and cervical samples. A subset (n = 1044) was tested for HPV DNA (SPF10/LiPA25 version 1). VE against 1-time detection of vulvar HPV16/18 among HPV vaccinated versus unvaccinated women was calculated and compared to the cervix. Prevalence of and risk factors for HPV were evaluated in the control arm (n = 536). Results: Vulvar HPV16/18 VE (54.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.9%-79.1%) was comparable to cervix (45.8%; 95% CI, 6.4%-69.4%). Vulvar and cervical HPV16 prevalence within the control arm was 3.0% and 4.7%, respectively. Independent risk factors for vulvar HPV were similar to cervix and included: age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.5 [95% CI,.3-.9] ≥28 vs 22-23]); marital status (aOR 2.3 [95% CI, 1.5-3.5] single vs married/living-asmarried); and number of sexual partners (aOR 3.6 [95% CI, 1.9-7.0] ≥6 vs 1). Conclusions: In this intention-to-treat analysis, VE against vulvar and cervical HPV16/18 were comparable 4 years following vaccination. Risk factors for HPV were similar by anatomic site. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT00128661.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)1890-1899
Número de páginas10
PublicaciónJournal of Infectious Diseases
Volumen210
N.º12
DOI
EstadoPublished - dic 2014

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author 2014.

Financiación

FinanciadoresNúmero del financiador
National Childhood Cancer Registry – National Cancer InstituteZIABC009052

    ODS de las Naciones Unidas

    Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible

    1. Good health and well being
      Good health and well being

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General Medicine

    Huella

    Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Reduced prevalence of vulvar HPV16/18 infection among women who received the HPV16/18 bivalent vaccine: A nested analysis within the Costa Rica Vaccine Trial'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

    Citar esto