TY - JOUR
T1 - Reflections on the generalization of agency theory
T2 - Cross-cultural considerations
AU - Johnson, Nancy Brown
AU - Droege, Scott
PY - 2004/9
Y1 - 2004/9
N2 - Agency theory assumes that employees and employers have different goals, act in a self-interested manner, and are willing to assume varying degrees of risk. In this paper, we argue that cultural differences may attenuate those assumptions and thereby temper agency theory predictions. Culture may align goals between employers and employees, change a company's preference for behavior- versus outcome-based pay, require higher incentives before employees will accept outcome-based pay, and lower the moral hazard concerns associated with outcome-based pay. Based on those arguments, we develop propositions that can be tested empirically.
AB - Agency theory assumes that employees and employers have different goals, act in a self-interested manner, and are willing to assume varying degrees of risk. In this paper, we argue that cultural differences may attenuate those assumptions and thereby temper agency theory predictions. Culture may align goals between employers and employees, change a company's preference for behavior- versus outcome-based pay, require higher incentives before employees will accept outcome-based pay, and lower the moral hazard concerns associated with outcome-based pay. Based on those arguments, we develop propositions that can be tested empirically.
KW - Agency theory
KW - Behavior- and outcome-based pay
KW - Culture
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/22944466044
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/22944466044#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.hrmr.2004.06.003
DO - 10.1016/j.hrmr.2004.06.003
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:22944466044
SN - 1053-4822
VL - 14
SP - 325
EP - 335
JO - Human Resource Management Review
JF - Human Resource Management Review
IS - 3
ER -