Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Rural residents' perspectives on an mhealth or personalized health coaching intervention: Qualitative study with focus groups and key informant interviews

  • Nancy Schoenberg
  • , Madeline Dunfee
  • , Hannah Yeager
  • , Matthew Rutledge
  • , Angela Pfammatter
  • , Bonnie Spring

Producción científica: Articlerevisión exhaustiva

13 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Background: Compared with national averages, rural Appalachians experience extremely elevated rates of premature morbidity and mortality. New opportunities, including approaches incorporating personal technology, may help improve lifestyles and overcome health inequities. Objective: This study aims to gather perspectives on whether a healthy lifestyle intervention, specifically an app originally designed for urban users, may be feasible and acceptable to rural residents. In addition to a smartphone app, this program-Make Better Choices 2-consists of personalized health coaching, accelerometer use, and financial incentives. Methods: We convened 4 focus groups and 16 key informant interviews with diverse community stakeholders to assess perspectives on this novel, evidence-based diet and physical activity intervention. Participants were shown a slide presentation and asked open-ended follow-up questions. The focus group and key informant interview sessions were audiotaped, transcribed, and subjected to thematic analysis. Results: We identified 3 main themes regarding Appalachian residents' perspectives on this mobile health (mHealth) intervention: Personal technology is feasible and desirable; challenges persist in implementing mHealth lifestyle interventions in Appalachian communities; and successful mHealth interventions should include personal connections, local coaches, and educational opportunities. Although viewed as feasible and acceptable overall, lack of healthy lifestyle awareness, habitual behavior, and financial constraints may challenge the success of mHealth lifestyle interventions in Appalachia. Finally, participants described several minor elements that require modification, including expanding the upper age inclusion, providing extra coaching on technology use, emphasizing personal and supportive connections, employing local coaches, and ensuring adequate educational content for the program. Conclusions: Blending new technologies, health coaching, and other features is not only acceptable but may be essential to reach vulnerable rural residents.

Idioma originalEnglish
Número de artículoe18853
PublicaciónJMIR Formative Research
Volumen5
N.º2
DOI
EstadoPublished - feb 2021

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 JMIR Publications Inc.. All right reserved.

Financiación

The authors would like to thank Sarah Stone, Deanna Sherman, Rachel Sexton, and the local community members who generously provided their insights. This research was supported by the Institutional Development Award from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under grant number P30 GM127211 and by pilot funding provided by the Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky.

FinanciadoresNúmero del financiador
University of Kentucky Department of Behavioral Science
National Institutes of Health (NIH)P30 GM127211
National Institute of General Medical Sciences

    ODS de las Naciones Unidas

    Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible

    1. Good health and well being
      Good health and well being

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Medicine (miscellaneous)
    • Health Informatics

    Huella

    Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Rural residents' perspectives on an mhealth or personalized health coaching intervention: Qualitative study with focus groups and key informant interviews'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

    Citar esto