Resumen
Amid crises of trust in government, the legitimacy of public organizations has never been more important. In this context, access to performance information ensures democratic control and thus legitimacy. However, performance evaluation is hindered by transaction costs in accessing and cognitive biases in interpreting performance. We examine two antecedents of citizen evaluations of performance: sector and bureaucratic reputation. Utilizing two experiments on a representative sample of Indian citizens, we situate our paper amid the increasing privatization of public services, and reputation management strategies used to influence performance evaluations. We discuss our findings and their implications for public management theory and practice.
| Idioma original | English |
|---|---|
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 457-484 |
| Número de páginas | 28 |
| Publicación | Administration and Society |
| Volumen | 55 |
| N.º | 3 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Published - mar 2023 |
Nota bibliográfica
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2023.
Financiación
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was generously supported by the National University of Singapore (Tier 1 Ministry of Education Grant).
| Financiadores |
|---|
| National University Hospital, Singapore |
| Ministry of Education China |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sociology and Political Science
- Public Administration
- Marketing
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Sector-Switching, Bureaucratic Reputation, and Citizen Evaluation of Performance: Evidence From a Large-Scale Experiment in India'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver