Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Sharpening Working Memory With Real-Time Electrophysiological Brain Signals: Which Neurofeedback Paradigms Work?

  • Yang Jiang
  • , William Jessee
  • , Stevie Hoyng
  • , Soheil Borhani
  • , Ziming Liu
  • , Xiaopeng Zhao
  • , Lacey K. Price
  • , Walter High
  • , Jeremiah Suhl
  • , Sylvia Cerel-Suhl

Producción científica: Review articlerevisión exhaustiva

19 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Growing evidence supports the idea that the ultimate biofeedback is to reward sensory pleasure (e.g., enhanced visual clarity) in real-time to neural circuits that are associated with a desired performance, such as excellent memory retrieval. Neurofeedback is biofeedback that uses real-time sensory reward to brain activity associated with a certain performance (e.g., accurate and fast recall). Working memory is a key component of human intelligence. The challenges are in our current limited understanding of neurocognitive dysfunctions as well as in technical difficulties for closed-loop feedback in true real-time. Here we review recent advancements of real time neurofeedback to improve memory training in healthy young and older adults. With new advancements in neuromarkers of specific neurophysiological functions, neurofeedback training should be better targeted beyond a single frequency approach to include frequency interactions and event-related potentials. Our review confirms the positive trend that neurofeedback training mostly works to improve memory and cognition to some extent in most studies. Yet, the training typically takes multiple weeks with 2–3 sessions per week. We review various neurofeedback reward strategies and outcome measures. A well-known issue in such training is that some people simply do not respond to neurofeedback. Thus, we also review the literature of individual differences in psychological factors e.g., placebo effects and so-called “BCI illiteracy” (Brain Computer Interface illiteracy). We recommend the use of Neural modulation sensitivity or BCI insensitivity in the neurofeedback literature. Future directions include much needed research in mild cognitive impairment, in non-Alzheimer’s dementia populations, and neurofeedback using EEG features during resting and sleep for memory enhancement and as sensitive outcome measures.

Idioma originalEnglish
Número de artículo780817
PublicaciónFrontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Volumen14
DOI
EstadoPublished - mar 28 2022

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Jiang, Jessee, Hoyng, Borhani, Liu, Zhao, Price, High, Suhl and Cerel-Suhl.

Financiación

Part of this work was supported by United States Department of Veterans Affairs grant RX003173-01, National Institute of Health AG060608, a pilot grant from Behavioral Science Department, a PSMRF research award, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, and Alzheimer’s Tennessee. Part of this work was supported by United States Department of Veterans Affairs grant RX003173-01, National Institute of Health AG060608, a pilot grant from Behavioral Science Department, a PSMRF research award, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, and Alzheimer?s Tennessee.

FinanciadoresNúmero del financiador
Alzheimer?s Tennessee
Alzheimer’s Tennessee
Department of Behavioral Science, 120 Medical Behavioral Science Building
University of Kentucky College of Medicine
National Institutes of Health (NIH)AG060608
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
U.S. Department of Veterans AffairsRX003173-01
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

    ODS de las Naciones Unidas

    Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible

    1. Good health and well being
      Good health and well being

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Aging
    • Cognitive Neuroscience

    Huella

    Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Sharpening Working Memory With Real-Time Electrophysiological Brain Signals: Which Neurofeedback Paradigms Work?'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

    Citar esto