Resumen
Imagine a health maintenance organization creating a policy to deny all smokers access to nonemergent coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The cost savings to the organization and society would be potentially significant. Now envision the smoker, a hardworking father with daily angina, and the provider, writing costly prescriptions to manage the angina. What ethical and legal questions do you suppose would present in that setting? Now imagine how you would respond if given this scenario of denying smokers access to nonemergent coronary artery bypass graft. This article discusses the implications of resource allocation with self-inflicted health behaviors such as smoking. Tough questions are raised that explore both the pros and the cons of smokers’ rights to coronary artery bypass graft.
| Idioma original | English |
|---|---|
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 32-35 |
| Número de páginas | 4 |
| Publicación | JONA's Healthcare Law, Ethics, and Regulation |
| Volumen | 4 |
| N.º | 2 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Published - 2002 |
ODS de las Naciones Unidas
Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible
-
Good health and well being
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects
- Health Policy
- Law
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Smokers’ rights to coronary artery bypass graft surgery'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver