Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

SOMETHING ROTS IN LAW ENFORCEMENT AND IT'S THE SEARCH WARRANT: THE BREONNA TAYLOR CASE

  • Blanche Bong Cook

Producción científica: Articlerevisión exhaustiva

6 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

When police rammed the door of Breonna Taylor's home and shot her five times in a hail of thirty-two bullets, they lacked legal justification for being there. The affidavit supporting the warrant was perjurious, stale, vague, and lacking in particularity. The killing of Breonna Taylor, however, is not just a story about the illegality of the warrant. It is also about the legality of the circumstances that facilitated her killing. Police officers lying to obtain warrants and magistrates rubber-stamping facially defective warrants are the stories of individual failings. This Article examines a weightier structural problem: How the Supreme Court fashioned legal doctrine that created the conditions that led to Breonna Taylor's death. This Article transcends the narrative of bad-apple cops. It is the first to present a structural framework for analyzing how Court rulings about the acquisition and execution of search warrants inequitably distribute premature death in marginalized communities. When the Court refused to apply the exclusionary rule to evidence obtained in violation of the knock-and-announce requirement, it incentivized police to ignore the rule. The result has been carelessness in the acquisition of warrants and callousness in their execution. When the Court gave police immunity for violating the rule, it sealed Breonna Taylor's fate. Police refusal to knock and announce and to engage in a substantial waiting period before ramming the door is untenable in an age of increased Stand Your Ground Laws and unbridled gun ownership. The proper protocols for police home invasion demand the Supreme Court's review. The spectacle of Breonna Taylor's killing, along with so many others, inflicted a cultural trauma on the public, particularly marginalized communities. The illegal warrant that set Breonna Taylor's death in motion, therefore, demands a public vetting, preferably in an adversarial setting where one party does not monopolize both the facts and the narratives surrounding those facts. The repeated failure to hold police accountable for their killings will destroy the criminal justice system as we know it. The next Breonna Taylor is both foreseeable and preventable.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)1-85
Número de páginas85
PublicaciónBoston University Law Review
Volumen102
N.º1
EstadoPublished - 2022

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Boston University Law Review. All rights reserved.

Financiación

* Associate Professor of Law, University of Kentucky J. David Rosenberg College of Law. B.A., Vassar College. J.D., University of Michigan Law School. Assistant United States Attorney, 2005-2014, United States Department of Justice. I would like to thank the University of Kentucky J. David Rosenberg College of Law for supporting this research with a summer research grant. Thank you to all of the following for deeply appreciated feedback: Christopher Bradley, Jennifer Chacon, Ramsi Woodcock, and Harold McDonough. I must specially thank my loyal and brilliant research assistants, without whom I would lose inspiration: Bennett Tuleja, Sarah Byres, Olivia Sandlin, and Chabre Woods. I want to express my gratitude to the Boston University Law Review editors who remarkably pushed this scholarship forward. I must also thank my Administrative Assistant April Brooks, particularly for all of her trips to my home during the pandemic. I want to dedicate this article to the memory of Breonna Taylor and Tamika Palmer, Breonna Taylor’s mother. I can only hope this Article provides a very small fraction of the justice that you both deserve.

Financiadores
University of Kentucky

    ODS de las Naciones Unidas

    Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible

    1. Peace justice and strong institutions
      Peace justice and strong institutions

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Law

    Huella

    Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'SOMETHING ROTS IN LAW ENFORCEMENT AND IT'S THE SEARCH WARRANT: THE BREONNA TAYLOR CASE'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

    Citar esto