Resumen
Instructional communication scholars have long been interested in creating and testing alternative approaches to measuring cognitive learning. One of the existing measures, the Cognitive Learning Measure (Frisby & Martin, 2010), has not yet been fully validated. This series of three studies examined the factorial and concurrent validity of the scale. Results revealed that a three-factor measurement model was a better fit to the data than the original unidimensional factor model. Concurrent validity was established with respect to student motives, affective learning, student interest, classroom participation, and out-of-class communication with their instructors. The measure is discussed as a viable option for both operationalization of cognitive learning and as a complement to other learning tests.
| Idioma original | English |
|---|---|
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 163-176 |
| Número de páginas | 14 |
| Publicación | Communication Methods and Measures |
| Volumen | 8 |
| N.º | 3 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Published - jul 2014 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Communication
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'The Cognitive Learning Measure: A Three-Study Examination of Validity'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver