Transcultural and psychometric validation of the Dispositional Resilience Scale (DRS-15) in Chinese adult women

Janet Yuen Ha Wong; Daniel Yee Tak Fong; Anna Wai Man Choi; Claudia Kor Yee Chan; Agnes Tiwari; Ko Ling Chan; Vincent Lai; T. K. Logan; Paul Bartone

doi:10.1007/s11136-014-0713-9

Transcultural and psychometric validation of the Dispositional Resilience Scale (DRS-15) in Chinese adult women

Janet Yuen Ha Wong
, Daniel Yee Tak Fong
, Anna Wai Man Choi
, Claudia Kor Yee Chan
, Agnes Tiwari
, Ko Ling Chan
, Vincent Lai
, T. K. Logan
, Paul Bartone

Producción científica: Article › revisión exhaustiva

23 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Purpose: The aim of this study was to report translation and transcultural adaptation of the 15-item Dispositional Resilience Scale in traditional Chinese (C-DRS-15) and evaluate its psychometric properties.

Methods: The DRS is a self-report instrument that measures psychological hardiness. We followed an international standard of cross-cultural translation and validation of patient-reported outcome measures to create the Chinese version. Then, the translated C-DRS-15 was validated on 542 Chinese women from a population-based sample in Hong Kong.

Results: The internal consistency and criterion-related validity were investigated. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the C-DRS-15 was supported by a modified three-factor structure in our Chinese sample (RMSEA = .06, CFI = .94, TLI = .92, and SRMR = .06). The reliability (Cronbach’s α coefficient = .78) and validity were satisfactory. Total resilience score was negatively correlated with depression (p < .001), with non-depressed women scoring higher on the C-DRS-15.

Conclusions: The C-DRS-15 was demonstrated to be a reliable and valid measurement to assess hardiness in Chinese women.

Idioma original	English
Páginas (desde-hasta)	2489-2494
Número de páginas	6
Publicación	Quality of Life Research
Volumen	23
N.º	9
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0713-9
Estado	Published - oct 7 2014

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© 2014, Springer International Publishing Switzerland.

Financiación

Acknowledgments This study was financially supported by the Seed Funding Programme for Basic Research, the University of Hong Kong. We would also like to thank Ms. Ruby Tang for contributing to the manuscript editing.

Financiadores
University of Hong Kong

ODS de las Naciones Unidas

Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible

Good health and well being

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Acceder al documento

10.1007/s11136-014-0713-9

Otros archivos y enlaces

Citar esto

@article{357e7107103440b9a11e7a9cf946cd51,

title = "Transcultural and psychometric validation of the Dispositional Resilience Scale (DRS-15) in Chinese adult women",

abstract = "Purpose: The aim of this study was to report translation and transcultural adaptation of the 15-item Dispositional Resilience Scale in traditional Chinese (C-DRS-15) and evaluate its psychometric properties.Methods: The DRS is a self-report instrument that measures psychological hardiness. We followed an international standard of cross-cultural translation and validation of patient-reported outcome measures to create the Chinese version. Then, the translated C-DRS-15 was validated on 542 Chinese women from a population-based sample in Hong Kong.Results: The internal consistency and criterion-related validity were investigated. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the C-DRS-15 was supported by a modified three-factor structure in our Chinese sample (RMSEA = .06, CFI = .94, TLI = .92, and SRMR = .06). The reliability (Cronbach{\textquoteright}s α coefficient = .78) and validity were satisfactory. Total resilience score was negatively correlated with depression (p < .001), with non-depressed women scoring higher on the C-DRS-15.Conclusions: The C-DRS-15 was demonstrated to be a reliable and valid measurement to assess hardiness in Chinese women.",

keywords = "Chinese, Hardiness, Psychological health, Psychometric validation, Resilience",

author = "Wong, \{Janet Yuen Ha\} and Fong, \{Daniel Yee Tak\} and Choi, \{Anna Wai Man\} and Chan, \{Claudia Kor Yee\} and Agnes Tiwari and Chan, \{Ko Ling\} and Vincent Lai and Logan, \{T. K.\} and Paul Bartone",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2014, Springer International Publishing Switzerland.",

year = "2014",

month = oct,

day = "7",

doi = "10.1007/s11136-014-0713-9",

language = "English",

volume = "23",

pages = "2489--2494",

number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transcultural and psychometric validation of the Dispositional Resilience Scale (DRS-15) in Chinese adult women

AU - Wong, Janet Yuen Ha

AU - Fong, Daniel Yee Tak

AU - Choi, Anna Wai Man

AU - Chan, Claudia Kor Yee

AU - Tiwari, Agnes

AU - Chan, Ko Ling

AU - Lai, Vincent

AU - Logan, T. K.

AU - Bartone, Paul

PY - 2014/10/7

Y1 - 2014/10/7

N2 - Purpose: The aim of this study was to report translation and transcultural adaptation of the 15-item Dispositional Resilience Scale in traditional Chinese (C-DRS-15) and evaluate its psychometric properties.Methods: The DRS is a self-report instrument that measures psychological hardiness. We followed an international standard of cross-cultural translation and validation of patient-reported outcome measures to create the Chinese version. Then, the translated C-DRS-15 was validated on 542 Chinese women from a population-based sample in Hong Kong.Results: The internal consistency and criterion-related validity were investigated. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the C-DRS-15 was supported by a modified three-factor structure in our Chinese sample (RMSEA = .06, CFI = .94, TLI = .92, and SRMR = .06). The reliability (Cronbach’s α coefficient = .78) and validity were satisfactory. Total resilience score was negatively correlated with depression (p < .001), with non-depressed women scoring higher on the C-DRS-15.Conclusions: The C-DRS-15 was demonstrated to be a reliable and valid measurement to assess hardiness in Chinese women.

AB - Purpose: The aim of this study was to report translation and transcultural adaptation of the 15-item Dispositional Resilience Scale in traditional Chinese (C-DRS-15) and evaluate its psychometric properties.Methods: The DRS is a self-report instrument that measures psychological hardiness. We followed an international standard of cross-cultural translation and validation of patient-reported outcome measures to create the Chinese version. Then, the translated C-DRS-15 was validated on 542 Chinese women from a population-based sample in Hong Kong.Results: The internal consistency and criterion-related validity were investigated. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the C-DRS-15 was supported by a modified three-factor structure in our Chinese sample (RMSEA = .06, CFI = .94, TLI = .92, and SRMR = .06). The reliability (Cronbach’s α coefficient = .78) and validity were satisfactory. Total resilience score was negatively correlated with depression (p < .001), with non-depressed women scoring higher on the C-DRS-15.Conclusions: The C-DRS-15 was demonstrated to be a reliable and valid measurement to assess hardiness in Chinese women.

KW - Chinese

KW - Hardiness

KW - Psychological health

KW - Psychometric validation

KW - Resilience

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84912002719

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84912002719#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1007/s11136-014-0713-9

DO - 10.1007/s11136-014-0713-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 24894382

AN - SCOPUS:84912002719

SN - 0962-9343

VL - 23

SP - 2489

EP - 2494

JO - Quality of Life Research

JF - Quality of Life Research

IS - 9

ER -

Transcultural and psychometric validation of the Dispositional Resilience Scale (DRS-15) in Chinese adult women

Resumen

Nota bibliográfica

Financiación

ODS de las Naciones Unidas

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Acceder al documento

Otros archivos y enlaces

Huella

Citar esto