Resumen
Sports fanship is a multidimensional concept. Fans are fans for a variety of reasons and show their fanship in an assortment of ways. In many studies, sports fanship is based on predetermined categories and closed-ended questions set by researchers. Such categories and questions may include certain types of fans while omitting others. This study assessed the extent to which closed-ended categorizations align with fans’ views of their own fanship. It also captured what it means to be—or not be—a sports fan from the respondent’s perspective. A total of 1,093 adults completed questionnaires using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. In response to a dichotomous choice question, roughly half self-reported as fans. A majority of self-identified fans described strong emotional and personal ties with sports. Most nonfans found little connection with sports: Sports were boring and inconsistent with how they defined themselves. Open-ended responses from a small proportion of fans and a larger subset of nonfans call into question the validity of a single, dichotomous choice measure of fanship. The results of this study document the importance of explicit conceptualizations and operationalizations of sports fanship.
| Idioma original | English |
|---|---|
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 611-629 |
| Número de páginas | 19 |
| Publicación | Communication and Sport |
| Volumen | 7 |
| N.º | 5 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Published - oct 1 2019 |
Nota bibliográfica
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2018.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Communication
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Unpacking What It Means to Be—or Not Be—A Fan'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver